Tjia Jennifer, Kutner Jean S, Ritchie Christine S, Blatchford Patrick J, Bennett Kendrick Rachael E, Prince-Paul Maryjo, Somers Tamara J, McPherson Mary Lynn, Sloan Jeff A, Abernethy Amy P, Furuno Jon P
1 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester, Massachusetts.
2 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
J Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;20(10):1098-1103. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0489. Epub 2017 May 18.
Optimal management of chronic medications for patients with life-limiting illness is uncertain. Medication deprescribing may improve outcomes in this population, but patient concerns regarding deprescribing are unclear.
The aim of this study was to quantify the perceived benefits and concerns of statin discontinuation among patients with life-limiting illness.
Baseline data from a multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial of statin discontinuation were used.
SETTING/SUBJECTS: Cognitively intact participants with a life expectancy of 1-12 months receiving statin medications for primary or secondary prevention were enrolled.
Responses to a 9-item questionnaire addressing patient concerns about discontinuing statins were collected. We used Pearson chi-square tests to compare responses by primary life-limiting diagnosis (cancer, cardiovascular disease, other).
Of 297 eligible participants, 58% had cancer, 8% had cardiovascular disease, and 30% other primary diagnoses. Mean (standard deviation) age was 72 (11) years. Fewer than 5% of participants expressed concern that statin deprescribing indicated physician abandonment. About one in five participants reported being told to take statins for the rest of their life (18%) or feeling that discontinuation represented prior wasted effort (18%). Many participants reported benefits of stopping statins, including spending less money on medications (63%), potentially stopping other medications (34%), and having a better quality of life (25%). More participants with cardiovascular disease as a primary diagnosis perceived that quality-of-life benefits related to statin discontinuation (52%) than participants with cancer (27%) or noncardiovascular disease diagnoses (27%) [p = 0.034].
Few participants expressed concerns about discontinuing statins; many perceived potential benefits. Cardiovascular disease patients perceived greater potential positive impact from statin discontinuation.
对于患有危及生命疾病的患者,慢性药物的最佳管理尚不确定。减停药物可能会改善该人群的治疗效果,但患者对减停药物的担忧尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是量化患有危及生命疾病的患者停用他汀类药物后感知到的益处和担忧。
使用了一项关于他汀类药物停用的多中心、实用性临床试验的基线数据。
设置/受试者:纳入了预期寿命为1至12个月、认知功能完好、因一级或二级预防而正在服用他汀类药物的参与者。
收集了一份针对患者对停用他汀类药物担忧的9项问卷的回复。我们使用Pearson卡方检验比较了主要危及生命诊断(癌症、心血管疾病、其他)的回复情况。
在297名符合条件的参与者中,58%患有癌症,8%患有心血管疾病,30%为其他主要诊断。平均(标准差)年龄为72(11)岁。不到5%的参与者表示担心停用他汀类药物意味着医生放弃治疗。约五分之一的参与者报告称被告知要终生服用他汀类药物(18%),或感觉停药意味着之前的努力白费(18%)。许多参与者报告了停用他汀类药物的益处,包括在药物上花费更少(63%)、可能停用其他药物(34%)以及生活质量更好(25%)。以心血管疾病作为主要诊断的参与者中,认为停用他汀类药物与生活质量改善相关的比例(52%)高于患有癌症的参与者(27%)或非心血管疾病诊断的参与者(27%)[p = 0.034]。
很少有参与者对停用他汀类药物表示担忧;许多人意识到了潜在益处。心血管疾病患者认为停用他汀类药物可能产生更大的积极影响。