• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项横断面混合方法研究方案,旨在从全科医疗报告的患者安全事件中汲取经验教训。

A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice.

作者信息

Carson-Stevens Andrew, Hibbert Peter, Avery Anthony, Butlin Amy, Carter Ben, Cooper Alison, Evans Huw Prosser, Gibson Russell, Luff Donna, Makeham Meredith, McEnhill Paul, Panesar Sukhmeet S, Parry Gareth, Rees Philippa, Shiels Emma, Sheikh Aziz, Ward Hope Olivia, Williams Huw, Wood Fiona, Donaldson Liam, Edwards Adrian

机构信息

Primary Care Patient Safety (PISA) Research Group, Primary and Emergency Care Research (PRIME) Centre Wales, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Australian Patient Safety Foundation, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 1;5(12):e009079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009079.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009079
PMID:26628526
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4680001/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incident reports contain descriptions of errors and harms that occurred during clinical care delivery. Few observational studies have characterised incidents from general practice, and none of these have been from the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System. This study aims to describe incidents reported from a general practice care setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A general practice patient safety incident classification will be developed to characterise patient safety incidents. A weighted-random sample of 12,500 incidents describing no harm, low harm and moderate harm of patients, and all incidents describing severe harm and death of patients will be classified. Insights from exploratory descriptive statistics and thematic analysis will be combined to identify priority areas for future interventions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The need for ethical approval was waivered by the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board research risk review committee given the anonymised nature of data (ABHB R&D Ref number: SA/410/13). The authors will submit the results of the study to relevant journals and undertake national and international oral presentations to researchers, clinicians and policymakers.

摘要

引言

事件报告包含临床护理过程中发生的错误和伤害的描述。很少有观察性研究对全科医疗中的事件进行特征描述,且这些研究均未来自英格兰和威尔士国家报告与学习系统。本研究旨在描述全科医疗环境中报告的事件。

方法与分析

将开发一种全科医疗患者安全事件分类方法,以对患者安全事件进行特征描述。将对12500起描述患者无伤害、低伤害和中度伤害的事件以及所有描述患者严重伤害和死亡的事件进行加权随机抽样分类。探索性描述性统计和主题分析的见解将相结合,以确定未来干预的优先领域。

伦理与传播

鉴于数据的匿名性质,阿neurin Bevan大学健康委员会研究风险审查委员会豁免了伦理批准的必要性(ABHB研发参考编号:SA/410/13)。作者将把研究结果提交给相关期刊,并向研究人员、临床医生和政策制定者进行国内和国际口头报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c566/4680001/f9471042e9ac/bmjopen2015009079f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c566/4680001/70b81aa3a927/bmjopen2015009079f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c566/4680001/f9471042e9ac/bmjopen2015009079f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c566/4680001/70b81aa3a927/bmjopen2015009079f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c566/4680001/f9471042e9ac/bmjopen2015009079f02.jpg

相似文献

1
A cross-sectional mixed methods study protocol to generate learning from patient safety incidents reported from general practice.一项横断面混合方法研究方案,旨在从全科医疗报告的患者安全事件中汲取经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 1;5(12):e009079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009079.
2
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
3
4
The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales.与医疗信息技术故障相关的 2627 起患者安全事件的影响和可预防措施:对英格兰和威尔士 10 年来事件报告的回顾性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e127-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30057-3. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Understanding the epidemiology of avoidable significant harm in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.了解初级保健中可避免的重大伤害的流行病学:一项回顾性横断面研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013786.
6
Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports.老年人不安全初级保健的来源:对患者安全事件报告的混合方法分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):833-839. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx044.
7
A mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incidents involving opioid substitution treatment with methadone or buprenorphine in community-based care in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士基于社区的美沙酮或丁丙诺啡类药物替代治疗中涉及阿片类药物使用障碍患者安全事件的混合方法分析。
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2066-2076. doi: 10.1111/add.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Nature of Blame in Patient Safety Incident Reports: Mixed Methods Analysis of a National Database.患者安全事件报告中的归咎性质:对国家数据库的混合方法分析
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Sep;15(5):455-461. doi: 10.1370/afm.2123.
9
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
10
Patient safety in eye care: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents involving implementation of care and clinical assessment in England and Wales.眼科护理中的患者安全:对英格兰和威尔士报告的涉及护理实施和临床评估的事件进行的多方法分析。
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1486-1494. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03669-6. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient safety in eye care: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents involving implementation of care and clinical assessment in England and Wales.眼科护理中的患者安全:对英格兰和威尔士报告的涉及护理实施和临床评估的事件进行的多方法分析。
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1486-1494. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03669-6. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Patient safety incidents within adult community-based mental health services in England: A mixed-methods examination of reported incidents, contributory factors, and proposed solutions.英格兰基于社区的成人心理健康服务中的患者安全事件:对报告事件、促成因素及建议解决方案的混合方法研究
Psychol Med. 2025 Feb 4;55:e8. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724003532.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing the burden of iatrogenic harm in children.减轻儿童医源性伤害的负担。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1593-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61739-6.
2
Safety incidents in the primary care office setting.基层医疗办公室环境中的安全事件。
Pediatrics. 2015 Jun;135(6):1027-35. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3259. Epub 2015 May 4.
3
Patient-safety-related hospital deaths in England: thematic analysis of incidents reported to a national database, 2010-2012.英格兰与患者安全相关的医院死亡情况:对2010 - 2012年上报至国家数据库的事件进行的主题分析
Understanding the scale and nature of avoidable healthcare-associated harm for prisoners in England: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.
了解英格兰囚犯可避免的医疗相关伤害的规模和性质:一项回顾性横断面研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e085607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085607.
4
Multiple points of system failure underpin continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents in palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.多系统故障是姑息治疗中持续皮下输注安全事件的基础:一项混合方法分析。
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):7-21. doi: 10.1177/02692163241287639. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
5
Analysis of applying a patient safety taxonomy to patient and clinician-reported incident reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.应用患者安全分类法分析 COVID-19 大流行期间患者和临床医生报告的不良事件报告:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02057-6.
6
Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports.老年人居住环境中的不安全护理:认证报告的内容分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Oct 26;35(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad085.
7
Family role in paediatric safety incidents: a retrospective study protocol.家庭在儿科安全事件中的角色:一项回顾性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):e075058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075058.
8
Patient safety in prisons: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents in England.监狱中的患者安全:英格兰报告事件的多方法分析。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Jul;116(7):236-245. doi: 10.1177/01410768231166138. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Learning from diagnostic errors to improve patient safety when GPs work in or alongside emergency departments: incorporating realist methodology into patient safety incident report analysis.从诊断错误中学习,以提高全科医生在急诊科工作或与之合作时的患者安全:将现实主义方法纳入患者安全事件报告分析中。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00537-w.
10
Mixed-methods study protocol: do national reporting and learning system medication incidents in palliative care reflect patient and carer concerns about medication management and safety?混合方法研究方案:国家报告和学习系统中的姑息治疗药物事件是否反映了患者和照护者对药物管理和安全性的关注?
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 13;11(9):e048696. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048696.
PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 24;11(6):e1001667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001667. eCollection 2014 Jun.
4
Quality improvement informed by a reporting and learning system.由报告和学习系统推动的质量改进。
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Jul;99(7):702-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306198. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
5
Global research priorities to better understand the burden of iatrogenic harm in primary care: an international Delphi exercise.全球研究重点旨在更好地了解初级保健中医源性伤害的负担:一项国际德尔菲研究。
PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001554. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
Central or local incident reporting? A comparative study in Dutch GP out-of-hours services.中心或当地事件报告?荷兰家庭医生夜间服务的比较研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Mar;61(584):183-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X561168.
7
Feasibility of centre-based incident reporting in primary healthcare: the SPIEGEL study.基于中心的初级保健事件报告的可行性:SPIEGEL 研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Feb;20(2):121-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.033472. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
8
Adverse events and comparison of systematic and voluntary reporting from a paediatric intensive care unit.儿科重症监护病房的不良事件以及系统报告与自愿报告的比较
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):568-71. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032979. Epub 2010 May 28.
9
Critical incident reporting in neonatal practice.新生儿实践中的关键事件报告。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Sep;95(5):F378-82. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.137869. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
10
Patient error: a preliminary taxonomy.患者失误:初步分类法。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;7(3):223-31. doi: 10.1370/afm.941.