Luo Ting, Gast Thomas J, Vermeer Tyler J, Burns Stephen A
School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 May 1;58(5):2685-2694. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21653.
To measure the effect of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) on retinal branching. To compare vascular branching in healthy and diabetic subjects with established biophysical models.
Vascular bifurcations in arteries and veins were imaged in 17 NPDR and 26 healthy subjects with the Indiana adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO). Vessel measurements were grouped according to parent vessel diameters into large (≤50 ∼ <100 μm) and small (≤20 ∼ <50 μm) sizes. Vessel diameters and bifurcation angles were measured manually. Vascular diameters were compared with predictions of Murray's law using curve fitting. For analysis of bifurcation angles, two models from Zamir were compared: one based on the power required for blood pumping, the other based on drag force between blood and vascular wall.
For normal larger vessels, the exponent relating the parent and daughter branching diameters was significantly less than the value of 3 predicted by Murray's law (arteries: 2.59; veins: 1.95). In NPDR, the best-fit exponent was close to 3 for arteries but close to 2 in healthy subjects in veins, (arteries: 3.09; veins: 2.16). For both small arteries and veins, diabetics' exponent differed from healthy subjects (P < 0.01). Bifurcation angles in the healthy subjects (78° ± with a standard error (SE) of 0.9°) were not much different than in NPDR (79° ± SE 1.3°). The model based on minimizing pumping power predicted the measurements better than the one minimizing the vascular drag and lumen surface area.
The relation between parent and daughter branch diameters changes in diabetes, but the branching angles do not.
测量非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)对视网膜分支的影响。将健康受试者和糖尿病受试者的血管分支与已建立的生物物理模型进行比较。
使用印第安纳自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜(AOSLO)对17例NPDR患者和26例健康受试者的动脉和静脉中的血管分叉进行成像。根据母血管直径将血管测量值分为大血管(≤50~<100μm)和小血管(≤20~<50μm)。手动测量血管直径和分叉角度。使用曲线拟合将血管直径与默里定律的预测值进行比较。为了分析分叉角度,比较了扎米尔的两个模型:一个基于血液泵送所需的功率,另一个基于血液与血管壁之间的阻力。
对于正常的较大血管,母分支和子分支直径之间的指数显著小于默里定律预测的3值(动脉:2.59;静脉:1.95)。在NPDR中,动脉的最佳拟合指数接近3,而在健康受试者中静脉的最佳拟合指数接近2(动脉:3.09;静脉:2.16)。对于小动脉和小静脉,糖尿病患者的指数与健康受试者不同(P<0.01)。健康受试者的分叉角度(78°±标准误差(SE)为0.9°)与NPDR患者的分叉角度(79°±SE 1.3°)差异不大。基于最小化泵送功率的模型比基于最小化血管阻力和管腔表面积的模型能更好地预测测量结果。
糖尿病患者中母分支和子分支直径之间的关系发生了变化,但分叉角度没有变化。