Suppr超能文献

全球各国健康指标估计:有用、不必要、不可避免?

Global estimates of country health indicators: useful, unnecessary, inevitable?

作者信息

AbouZahr Carla, Boerma Ties, Hogan Daniel

机构信息

a CAZ Consulting , Geneva , Switzerland.

b Department of Information, Evidence and Research , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2017 Jan-Dec;10(sup1):1290370. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1290370.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The MDG era relied on global health estimates to fill data gaps and ensure temporal and cross-country comparability in reporting progress. Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals will present new challenges, requiring enhanced capacities to generate, analyse, interpret and use country produced data.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the development of global health estimates and discuss their utility and limitations from global and country perspectives.

DESIGN

Descriptive paper based on findings of intercountry workshops, reviews of literatureon and synthesis of experiences.

RESULTS

Producers of global health estimates focus on the technical soundness of estimation methods and comparability of the results across countries and over time. By contrast, country users are more concerned about the extent of their involvement in the estimation process and hesitate to buy into estimates derived using methods their technical staff cannot explain and that differ from national data sources. Quantitative summaries of uncertainty may be of limited practical use in policy discussions where decisions need to be made about what to do next.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater transparency and involvement of country partners in the development of global estimates will help improve ownership, strengthen country capacities for data production and use, and reduce reliance on externally produced estimates.

摘要

背景

千年发展目标时代依靠全球卫生估计数来填补数据空白,并确保在报告进展情况时具有时间上和跨国的可比性。监测可持续发展目标将带来新的挑战,需要增强生成、分析、解释和使用各国自行产生的数据的能力。

目的

总结全球卫生估计数的发展情况,并从全球和国家角度讨论其效用和局限性。

设计

基于国家间研讨会的结果、文献综述和经验综合的描述性论文。

结果

全球卫生估计数的编制者注重估计方法的技术合理性以及结果在不同国家和不同时间的可比性。相比之下,国家使用者更关心他们在估计过程中的参与程度,对于采用其技术人员无法解释且与国家数据来源不同的方法得出的估计数持犹豫态度。在需要就下一步行动做出决策的政策讨论中,不确定性的定量汇总可能实际用途有限。

结论

提高国家伙伴在全球估计数编制过程中的透明度和参与度,将有助于提高自主权,加强各国的数据生成和使用能力,并减少对外部编制的估计数的依赖。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验