Suppr超能文献

应用基于蛋白的酰胺质子转移磁共振成像来区分单发脑转移瘤和胶质母细胞瘤。

Applying protein-based amide proton transfer MR imaging to distinguish solitary brain metastases from glioblastoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Gongye Road M No.253, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China.

Department of Geriatrics, The First People' Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4516-4524. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4867-z. Epub 2017 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the utility of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MR imaging in distinguishing solitary brain metastases (SBMs) from glioblastomas (GBMs).

METHODS

Forty-five patients with SBMs and 43 patients with GBMs underwent conventional and APT-weighted sequences before clinical intervention. The APTw parameters and relative APTw (rAPTw) parameters in the tumour core and the peritumoral brain zone (PBZ) were obtained and compared between SBMs and GBMs. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the best parameter for distinguishing between the two groups.

RESULTS

The APTw, APTw, APTw, rAPTw, rAPTw or rAPTw values in the tumour core were not significantly different between the SBM and GBM groups (P = 0.141, 0.361, 0.221, 0.305, 0.578 and 0.448, respectively). However, the APTw, APTw, APTw, rAPTw, rAPTw or rAPTw values in the PBZ were significantly lower in the SBM group than in the GBM group (P < 0.001). The APTw values had the highest area under the ROC curve 0.905 and accuracy 85.2% in discriminating between the two neoplasms.

CONCLUSION

As a noninvasive imaging method, APT-weighted MR imaging can be used to distinguish SBMs from GBMs.

KEY POINTS

• APTw values in the tumour core were not different between SBMs and GBMs. • APTw values in peritumoral brain zone were lower in SBMs than in GBMs. • The APTw was the best parameter to distinguish SBMs from GBMs.

摘要

目的

确定酰胺质子转移加权(APTw)MR 成像在区分单发脑转移瘤(SBM)和胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中的作用。

方法

45 例 SBM 患者和 43 例 GBM 患者在临床干预前均行常规和 APT 加权序列检查。获取肿瘤核心区和瘤周脑区(PBZ)的 APTw 参数和相对 APTw(rAPTw)参数,并对 SBM 和 GBM 进行比较。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估鉴别两组的最佳参数。

结果

肿瘤核心区的 APTw、APTw、APTw、rAPTw、rAPTw 和 rAPTw 值在 SBM 和 GBM 两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.141、0.361、0.221、0.305、0.578 和 0.448)。然而,PBZ 区的 APTw、APTw、APTw、rAPTw、rAPTw 和 rAPTw 值在 SBM 组显著低于 GBM 组(P<0.001)。APTw 值在鉴别两种肿瘤方面具有最高的 ROC 曲线下面积 0.905 和准确率 85.2%。

结论

作为一种无创成像方法,APTw 加权 MR 成像可用于区分 SBM 和 GBM。

关键点

• SBM 和 GBM 肿瘤核心区的 APTw 值无差异。• SBM 的 PBZ 区 APTw 值低于 GBM。• APTw 是鉴别 SBM 和 GBM 的最佳参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验