Suppr超能文献

酰胺质子转移加权成像的直方图分析:对比强化肿瘤和肿瘤周围区域的胶质母细胞瘤和单发脑转移瘤。

Histogram analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging: comparison of glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis in enhancing tumors and peritumoral regions.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8544, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug;29(8):4133-4140. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5832-1. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Differentiation of glioblastomas (GBMs) and solitary brain metastases (SBMs) is an important clinical problem. The aim of this study was to determine whether amide proton transfer-weighted (APTW) imaging is useful for distinguishing GBMs from SBMs.

METHODS

We examined 31 patients with GBM and 17 with SBM. For each tumor, enhancing areas (EAs) and surrounding non-enhancing areas with T2-prolongation (peritumoral high signal intensity areas, PHAs) were manually segmented using fusion images of the post-contrast T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. The mean amide proton transfer signal intensities (APTSIs) were compared among the EAs, PHAs, and contralateral normal appearing white matter (NAWM) within each tumor type. Furthermore, we analyzed APTSI histograms to compare the EAs and PHAs of GBMs and SBMs.

RESULTS

In GBMs, the mean APTSI in EAs (2.92 ± 0.74%) was the highest, followed by that in PHAs (1.64 ± 0.83%, p < 0.001) and NAWM (0.43 ± 0.83%, p < 0.001). In SBMs, the mean APTSI in EAs (1.85 ± 0.99%) and PHAs (1.42 ± 0.45%) were significantly higher than that in NAWM (0.42 ± 0.30%, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between EAs and PHAs. The mean and 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles for APT in EAs of GBMs were significantly higher than those of SBMs. However, no significant difference was found between GBMs and SBMs in any histogram parameters for PHA.

CONCLUSIONS

APTSI in EAs, but not PHAs, is useful for differentiation between GBMs and SBMs.

KEY POINTS

• Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and histogram analysis in the enhancing tumor can provide useful information for differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastasis. • Amide proton transfer signal intensity histogram parameters from peritumoral areas showed no significant difference between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastasis. • Vasogenic edema alone can substantially increase amide proton transfer signal intensity which may mimic tumor invasion.

摘要

目的

鉴别胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)和单发脑转移瘤(SBM)是一个重要的临床问题。本研究旨在确定酰胺质子转移加权(APTW)成像是否有助于区分 GBM 和 SBM。

方法

我们检查了 31 例 GBM 患者和 17 例 SBM 患者。对于每个肿瘤,使用对比后 T1 加权和 T2 加权图像的融合图像手动分割增强区(EAs)和伴有 T2 延长的周围非增强区(肿瘤周围高信号强度区,PHAs)。比较每种肿瘤类型中肿瘤内 EAs、PHAs 和对侧正常外观白质(NAWM)的平均酰胺质子转移信号强度(APTSI)。此外,我们分析了 APTSI 直方图,以比较 GBM 和 SBM 的 EAs 和 PHAs。

结果

在 GBM 中,EAs 的平均 APTSI(2.92±0.74%)最高,其次是 PHAs(1.64±0.83%,p<0.001)和 NAWM(0.43±0.83%,p<0.001)。在 SBM 中,EAs(1.85±0.99%)和 PHAs(1.42±0.45%)的平均 APTSI 明显高于 NAWM(0.42±0.30%,p<0.001),而 EAs 和 PHAs 之间无显著差异。GBM 中 EAs 的平均 APTSI 值及其 10、25、50、75 和 90 百分位数明显高于 SBM。然而,在 PHAs 的任何直方图参数方面,GBM 和 SBM 之间均无显著差异。

结论

EAs 的 APTSI 而不是 PHAs 的 APTSI 有助于 GBM 和 SBM 的鉴别。

重点

• 增强肿瘤的酰胺质子转移加权成像和直方图分析可为鉴别胶质母细胞瘤和单发脑转移瘤提供有用的信息。• 肿瘤周围区域的酰胺质子转移信号强度直方图参数在胶质母细胞瘤和单发脑转移瘤之间无显著差异。• 单纯血管源性水肿可显著增加酰胺质子转移信号强度,从而可能模拟肿瘤侵袭。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验