• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

委员会意见 No. 701 概要:选择良性疾病的子宫切除术途径。

Committee Opinion No. 701 Summary: Choosing The Route Of Hysterectomy For Benign Disease.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1149-1150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002108.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002108
PMID:28538491
Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the United States. Selection of the route of hysterectomy for benign causes can be influenced by the size and shape of the vagina and uterus; accessibility to the uterus; extent of extrauterine disease; the need for concurrent procedures; surgeon training and experience; average case volume; available hospital technology, devices, and support; whether the case is emergent or scheduled; and preference of the informed patient. Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered "minimally invasive" surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy should be performed, whenever feasible, based on their well-documented advantages over abdominal hysterectomy. The vaginal approach is preferred among the minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a preferable alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom a vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. Although minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are the preferred route, open abdominal hysterectomy remains an important surgical option for some patients. The obstetrician-gynecologist should discuss the options with patients and make clear recommendations on which route of hysterectomy will maximize benefits and minimize risks given the specific clinical situation. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the approaches to hysterectomy should be discussed in the context of the patient's values and preferences, and the patient and health care provider should together determine the best course of action after this discussion.

摘要

子宫切除术是美国最常进行的手术之一。选择良性病因的子宫切除术途径可以受到阴道和子宫的大小和形状、子宫的可及性、子宫外疾病的程度、是否需要同时进行其他手术、外科医生的培训和经验、平均病例量、医院可用的技术、设备和支持、病例是紧急情况还是计划中的、以及知情患者的偏好的影响。阴道和腹腔镜手术被认为是“微创”手术方法,因为它们不需要大的腹部切口,因此与开腹子宫切除术相比,通常与缩短住院时间和术后恢复时间相关。基于其经过充分记录的优于开腹子宫切除术的优势,应尽可能地采用微创方法进行子宫切除术。在微创方法中,阴道途径是首选。对于那些不适合或无法进行阴道子宫切除术的患者,腹腔镜子宫切除术是开腹子宫切除术的更好替代方法。尽管微创子宫切除术是首选途径,但对于某些患者,开腹子宫切除术仍然是一种重要的手术选择。妇产科医生应与患者讨论各种选择,并根据具体的临床情况,明确推荐哪种子宫切除术途径将最大限度地提高益处并最小化风险。应在患者的价值观和偏好的背景下讨论子宫切除术方法的相对优缺点,并且在讨论后,患者和医疗保健提供者应共同确定最佳行动方案。

相似文献

1
Committee Opinion No. 701 Summary: Choosing The Route Of Hysterectomy For Benign Disease.委员会意见 No. 701 概要:选择良性疾病的子宫切除术途径。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1149-1150. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002108.
2
Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease.委员会意见 701:选择良性疾病的子宫切除术途径。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):e155-e159. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002112.
3
In Search for the Best Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approach for the Large Uterus: A Review.寻找治疗大子宫的最佳微创子宫切除术方法:综述
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60(2):286-295. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000285.
4
The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.妇产科医生-介入放射科医生关系对子宫肌瘤患者治疗方式选择的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):214-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.12.015.
5
Hysterectomy in the 21st century: different approaches, different challenges.21世纪的子宫切除术:不同的手术方式,不同的挑战。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;49(4):722-35. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000211946.51712.42.
6
Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.良性指征的微创子宫切除术:最新进展
Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Jun;69(3):295-303. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04017-5. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
[Uterine volume and vaginal hysterectomy: Interest and limits of uterine morcellation].[子宫体积与阴道子宫切除术:子宫粉碎术的益处与局限性]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016 Mar;44(3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
[Factors considered to choose type of a hysterectomy for benign uterus lesions (excluding prolapsus and obstetrical indications)].[选择良性子宫病变(不包括脱垂和产科指征)子宫切除术类型时考虑的因素]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2005 May;34(3 Pt 1):241-51. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(05)82742-5.
9
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.444:良性疾病子宫切除术的手术途径选择。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
10
Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.系统实施腹腔镜子宫切除术与子宫大小无关:临床效果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):505-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Disparities in Minimally Invasive Benign Hysterectomy.微创良性子宫切除术的种族差异
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00018. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
2
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).经微创外科(MIS)行子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017.
3
Myomectomy: Choosing the Surgical Approach - A Systematic Review.子宫肌瘤切除术:手术方式的选择——一项系统评价
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2024 Jul 18;13(3):146-153. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_152_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women's Lives.优化子宫切除术:手术技术的前瞻性比较分析及其对女性生活的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 29;14(3):265. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030265.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with vaginal reconstructive procedures and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与阴道重建手术及经腹骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 12;10:1269214. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1269214. eCollection 2023.
6
Variations in sexual function after laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy in women with benign gynecologic diseases.良性妇科疾病女性行腹腔镜单孔全子宫切除术后性功能的变化
Open Med (Wars). 2023 Jul 31;18(1):20230761. doi: 10.1515/med-2023-0761. eCollection 2023.
7
Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future.妇科机器人手术:现状与未来。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023 Nov;66(6):518-528. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23132. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Revolution: The Next Frontier in Gynecologic Minimally Invasive Surgery.阴道自然腔道内镜手术革命:妇科微创外科的下一个前沿领域。
JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00082.
9
Validation of Transvaginal Hysterectomy Surgical Model - Modification of the Flowerpot Model to Improve Vesicovaginal Plane Simulation.经阴道子宫切除术手术模型的验证——通过改良花盆模型以改善膀胱阴道平面模拟
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Aug;28(8):1526-1530. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
10
Society of gynecologic oncology future of physician payment reform task force: Lessons learned in developing and implementing surgical alternative payment models.妇科肿瘤学会医生薪酬改革未来工作组:制定和实施手术替代支付模式的经验教训。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):701-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.036. Epub 2020 Jan 6.