• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用单一蛋白质、单一碳水化合物和商业食品进行斑贴试验评估犬类食物不良反应。

Evaluation of canine adverse food reactions by patch testing with single proteins, single carbohydrates and commercial foods.

作者信息

Johansen Cornelia, Mariani Claire, Mueller Ralf S

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University, Veterinaerstr. 13, Munich, 80539, Germany.

Royal Canin SAS, Aimargues, F-30470, France.

出版信息

Vet Dermatol. 2017 Oct;28(5):473-e109. doi: 10.1111/vde.12455. Epub 2017 May 22.

DOI:10.1111/vde.12455
PMID:28544017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse food reaction (AFR) is an important differential diagnosis for the pruritic dog. It is usually diagnosed by feeding an elimination diet with a novel protein and carbohydrate source for eight weeks followed by subsequent food provocation. A previous study demonstrated that patch testing dogs with foods had a high sensitivity and negative predictability for selection of elimination diet ingredients.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate patch testing with proteins, carbohydrates and dry commercial dog food in dogs to determine whether there was value in patch testing to aid the diagnosis of canine adverse food reaction.

METHODS

Twenty five privately owned dogs, with confirmed AFR, underwent provocation trials with selected food antigens and patch testing.

RESULTS

For proteins, carbohydrates and dry dog food the sensitivity of patch testing was 100%, 70% and 22.2%, respectively; the negative predictive values of patch testing were 100%, 79% and 72%. The positive predictive values of patch testing for proteins and carbohydrates were 75% and 74%, respectively.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

This study confirmed that patch testing may be useful for the selection of a suitable protein source for an elimination diet in dogs with suspected AFR, but not as a diagnostic tool for canine AFR. Results for proteins are more reliable than for carbohydrates and the majority of positive patch test reactions were observed with raw protein. Patch testing with commercial dog food does not seem to be useful.

摘要

背景

食物不良反应(AFR)是瘙痒犬的重要鉴别诊断。通常通过喂食含新蛋白质和碳水化合物来源的排除性饮食八周,随后进行食物激发试验来诊断。先前的一项研究表明,对犬进行食物斑贴试验对于选择排除性饮食成分具有较高的敏感性和阴性预测值。

假设/目的:本研究的目的是调查对犬进行蛋白质、碳水化合物和市售干狗粮斑贴试验,以确定斑贴试验在辅助诊断犬类食物不良反应方面是否有价值。

方法

25只确诊为AFR的家养犬接受了选定食物抗原的激发试验和斑贴试验。

结果

对于蛋白质、碳水化合物和干狗粮,斑贴试验的敏感性分别为100%、70%和22.2%;斑贴试验的阴性预测值分别为100%、79%和72%。蛋白质和碳水化合物斑贴试验的阳性预测值分别为75%和74%。

结论及临床意义

本研究证实,斑贴试验可能有助于为疑似AFR的犬选择合适的排除性饮食蛋白质来源,但不能作为犬类AFR的诊断工具。蛋白质的结果比碳水化合物更可靠,大多数阳性斑贴试验反应出现在生蛋白质上。对市售狗粮进行斑贴试验似乎没有用处。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of canine adverse food reactions by patch testing with single proteins, single carbohydrates and commercial foods.通过使用单一蛋白质、单一碳水化合物和商业食品进行斑贴试验评估犬类食物不良反应。
Vet Dermatol. 2017 Oct;28(5):473-e109. doi: 10.1111/vde.12455. Epub 2017 May 22.
2
Patch testing and allergen-specific serum IgE and IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of canine adverse food reactions.斑贴试验以及变应原特异性血清IgE和IgG抗体在犬类食物不良反应诊断中的应用
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2012 Feb 15;145(3-4):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
3
Diagnostic testing of dogs for food hypersensitivity.犬类食物过敏的诊断检测
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991 Jan 15;198(2):245-50.
4
Combined prick and patch tests for diagnosis of food hypersensitivity in dogs with chronic pruritus.联合点刺和斑贴试验诊断慢性瘙痒犬的食物过敏。
Vet Dermatol. 2022 Apr;33(2):124-e36. doi: 10.1111/vde.13055. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
5
An assessment of a Western blot method for the investigation of canine cutaneous adverse food reactions.一种用于调查犬类皮肤食物不良反应的蛋白质印迹法评估。
Vet Dermatol. 2018 Jun;29(3):217-e78. doi: 10.1111/vde.12536. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (4): can we diagnose adverse food reactions in dogs and cats with in vivo or in vitro tests?伴侣动物食物不良反应的严格评价主题(4):我们能否通过体内或体外试验诊断犬猫的食物不良反应?
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Aug 30;13(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1142-0.
7
Detection of DNA from undeclared animal species in commercial elimination diets for dogs using PCR.使用聚合酶链式反应(PCR)检测犬用商业绝育日粮中未申报动物物种的DNA。
Vet Dermatol. 2017 Aug;28(4):373-e86. doi: 10.1111/vde.12431. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Identification of undeclared sources of animal origin in canine dry foods used in dietary elimination trials.鉴定用于饮食排除试验的犬干粮中未申报的动物源性成分。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 May;97 Suppl 1:32-8. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12045.
9
A retrospective analysis of case series using home-prepared and chicken hydrolysate diets in the diagnosis of adverse food reactions in 181 pruritic dogs.一项对181只瘙痒犬使用自制饮食和鸡肉水解物饮食进行不良食物反应诊断的病例系列回顾性分析。
Vet Dermatol. 2006 Aug;17(4):273-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2006.00522.x.
10
Clinical efficacy of a novel elimination diet composed of a mixture of amino acids and potatoes in dogs with non-seasonal pruritic dermatitis.一种由氨基酸和土豆混合而成的新型排除饮食对非季节性瘙痒性皮炎犬的临床疗效。
J Vet Med Sci. 2010 Nov;72(11):1413-21. doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0014. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardization of Beef, Pork, Chicken, and Soy Protein Extracts for Patch Testing and Their Accuracy in Diagnosing Adverse Food Reactions in Dogs with Chronic Pruritus.用于犬类慢性瘙痒症斑贴试验的牛肉、猪肉、鸡肉和大豆蛋白提取物标准化及其在诊断食物不良反应中的准确性
Vet Sci. 2025 Apr 18;12(4):383. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12040383.
2
Comparative Study of Classical and Alternative Therapy in Dogs with Allergies.犬类过敏症经典疗法与替代疗法的对比研究。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 19;12(14):1832. doi: 10.3390/ani12141832.
3
Successful nutritional control of scratching and clinical signs associated with adverse food reaction: A randomized controlled COSCAD'18 adherent clinical trial in dogs in the United Kingdom.
成功控制与食物不良反应相关的瘙痒和临床症状的营养干预:一项在英国针对犬的随机对照 COSCAD'18 依从性临床试验。
J Vet Intern Med. 2021 Jul;35(4):1893-1901. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16192. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Successful nutritional control of scratching and clinical signs associated with adverse food reaction: A randomized controlled COSCAD'18 adherent clinical trial in dogs in the United States.成功控制与食物不良反应相关的瘙痒和临床症状的营养干预:一项在美国进行的、针对犬的、随机对照、COSCAID'18 依从性临床试验。
J Vet Intern Med. 2021 Jul;35(4):1884-1892. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16193. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (6): prevalence of noncutaneous manifestations of adverse food reactions in dogs and cats.伴侣动物食物不良反应的严格评价主题(6):犬猫食物不良反应的非皮肤表现患病率
BMC Vet Res. 2018 Nov 12;14(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1656-0.
6
Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (4): can we diagnose adverse food reactions in dogs and cats with in vivo or in vitro tests?伴侣动物食物不良反应的严格评价主题(4):我们能否通过体内或体外试验诊断犬猫的食物不良反应?
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Aug 30;13(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1142-0.
7
Canine atopic dermatitis: detailed guidelines for diagnosis and allergen identification.犬异位性皮炎:诊断和过敏原鉴定的详细指南。
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Aug 11;11:196. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0515-5.