Yan Fangrong, Mandrekar Sumithra J, Yuan Ying
Division of Biostatistics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):3994-4003. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0220. Epub 2017 May 25.
The primary objective of phase I oncology trials is to find the MTD. The 3+3 design is easy to implement but performs poorly in finding the MTD. A newer design, such as the modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) design, provides better accuracy to identify the MTD but tends to overdose patients. We propose the keyboard design, an intuitive Bayesian design that conducts dose escalation and de-escalation based on whether the strongest key, defined as the dosing interval that most likely contains the current dose, is below or above the target dosing interval. The keyboard design can be implemented in a simple way, similar to the traditional 3+3 design, but provides more flexibility for choosing the target toxicity rate and cohort size. Our simulation studies demonstrate that compared with the 3+3 design, the keyboard design has favorable operating characteristics in terms of identifying the MTD. Compared with the mTPI design, the keyboard design is safer, with a substantially lower risk of treating patients at overly toxic doses, and has the better precision to identify the MTD, thereby providing a useful upgrade to the mTPI design. Software freely available at http://www.trialdesign.org facilitates the application of the keyboard design. .
肿瘤学I期试验的主要目标是确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)。3+3设计易于实施,但在确定MTD方面表现不佳。一种更新的设计,如改良毒性概率区间(mTPI)设计,在识别MTD方面具有更高的准确性,但往往会使患者用药过量。我们提出了键盘设计,这是一种直观的贝叶斯设计,它根据定义为最有可能包含当前剂量的给药间隔的最强键是低于还是高于目标给药间隔来进行剂量递增和递减。键盘设计可以以一种简单的方式实施,类似于传统的3+3设计,但在选择目标毒性率和队列大小时提供了更大的灵活性。我们的模拟研究表明,与3+3设计相比,键盘设计在识别MTD方面具有良好的操作特性。与mTPI设计相比,键盘设计更安全,以过高毒性剂量治疗患者的风险显著更低,并且在识别MTD方面具有更好的精度,从而为mTPI设计提供了有益的升级。可在http://www.trialdesign.org免费获取的软件促进了键盘设计的应用。