Suppr超能文献

《键盘:一种用于I期临床试验的新型贝叶斯毒性概率区间设计》

Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Yan Fangrong, Mandrekar Sumithra J, Yuan Ying

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):3994-4003. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0220. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

The primary objective of phase I oncology trials is to find the MTD. The 3+3 design is easy to implement but performs poorly in finding the MTD. A newer design, such as the modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) design, provides better accuracy to identify the MTD but tends to overdose patients. We propose the keyboard design, an intuitive Bayesian design that conducts dose escalation and de-escalation based on whether the strongest key, defined as the dosing interval that most likely contains the current dose, is below or above the target dosing interval. The keyboard design can be implemented in a simple way, similar to the traditional 3+3 design, but provides more flexibility for choosing the target toxicity rate and cohort size. Our simulation studies demonstrate that compared with the 3+3 design, the keyboard design has favorable operating characteristics in terms of identifying the MTD. Compared with the mTPI design, the keyboard design is safer, with a substantially lower risk of treating patients at overly toxic doses, and has the better precision to identify the MTD, thereby providing a useful upgrade to the mTPI design. Software freely available at http://www.trialdesign.org facilitates the application of the keyboard design. .

摘要

肿瘤学I期试验的主要目标是确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)。3+3设计易于实施,但在确定MTD方面表现不佳。一种更新的设计,如改良毒性概率区间(mTPI)设计,在识别MTD方面具有更高的准确性,但往往会使患者用药过量。我们提出了键盘设计,这是一种直观的贝叶斯设计,它根据定义为最有可能包含当前剂量的给药间隔的最强键是低于还是高于目标给药间隔来进行剂量递增和递减。键盘设计可以以一种简单的方式实施,类似于传统的3+3设计,但在选择目标毒性率和队列大小时提供了更大的灵活性。我们的模拟研究表明,与3+3设计相比,键盘设计在识别MTD方面具有良好的操作特性。与mTPI设计相比,键盘设计更安全,以过高毒性剂量治疗患者的风险显著更低,并且在识别MTD方面具有更好的精度,从而为mTPI设计提供了有益的升级。可在http://www.trialdesign.org免费获取的软件促进了键盘设计的应用。

相似文献

3
Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.新型 I 期临床试验设计的准确性、安全性和可靠性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4357-4364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Keyboard design for phase I drug-combination trials.用于I期药物联合试验的键盘设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 May;92:105972. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105972. Epub 2020 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Dose-finding trial designs for combination therapies in oncology.肿瘤学联合疗法的剂量探索试验设计。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 10;32(2):65-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.9198. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Principles of dose finding studies in cancer: a comparison of trial designs.癌症剂量探索研究的原则:试验设计比较。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 May;71(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2059-8. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验