Batula Alyssa M, Mark Jesse A, Kim Youngmoo E, Ayaz Hasan
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2017;2017:5491296. doi: 10.1155/2017/5491296. Epub 2017 May 4.
Motor-activity-related mental tasks are widely adopted for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as they are a natural extension of movement intention, requiring no training to evoke brain activity. The ideal BCI aims to eliminate neuromuscular movement, making motor imagery tasks, or imagined actions with no muscle movement, good candidates. This study explores cortical activation differences between motor imagery and motor execution for both upper and lower limbs using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Four simple finger- or toe-tapping tasks (left hand, right hand, left foot, and right foot) were performed with both motor imagery and motor execution and compared to resting state. Significant activation was found during all four motor imagery tasks, indicating that they can be detected via fNIRS. Motor execution produced higher activation levels, a faster response, and a different spatial distribution compared to motor imagery, which should be taken into account when designing an imagery-based BCI. When comparing left versus right, upper limb tasks are the most clearly distinguishable, particularly during motor execution. Left and right lower limb activation patterns were found to be highly similar during both imagery and execution, indicating that higher resolution imaging, advanced signal processing, or improved subject training may be required to reliably distinguish them.
与运动活动相关的心理任务被广泛应用于脑机接口(BCI),因为它们是运动意图的自然延伸,无需训练即可诱发大脑活动。理想的脑机接口旨在消除神经肌肉运动,这使得运动想象任务,即没有肌肉运动的想象动作,成为合适的选择。本研究使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)探索上肢和下肢在运动想象和运动执行之间的皮质激活差异。进行了四个简单的手指或脚趾敲击任务(左手、右手、左脚和右脚),包括运动想象和运动执行,并与静息状态进行比较。在所有四个运动想象任务中均发现了显著激活,表明它们可以通过fNIRS检测到。与运动想象相比,运动执行产生了更高的激活水平、更快的反应以及不同的空间分布,在设计基于想象的脑机接口时应予以考虑。在比较左右时,上肢任务最容易区分,尤其是在运动执行期间。发现在想象和执行过程中,左右下肢的激活模式高度相似,这表明可能需要更高分辨率的成像、先进的信号处理或改进的受试者训练才能可靠地区分它们。