Buying a significant result: Do we need to reconsider the role of the P value?
作者信息
Jiroutek Michael R, Rick Turner J
机构信息
Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, QuintilesIMS, Durham, NC, USA.
出版信息
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Sep;19(9):919-921. doi: 10.1111/jch.13021. Epub 2017 May 26.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Buying a significant result: Do we need to reconsider the role of the P value?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Sep;19(9):919-921. doi: 10.1111/jch.13021. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Should we trust abstracts from pain conferences? Publication bias and discordance between abstract and publication.我们应该相信疼痛会议的摘要吗？发表偏倚以及摘要与发表内容之间的不一致性。
Pain Manag. 2020 Jan;10(1):5-7. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2019-0049. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.对外科医生科学家发表偏倚的评估。
Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302.
4
Bias in research.研究中的偏倚。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(1):12-5. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.003.
5
A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.一种减轻发表偏倚的贝叶斯方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):74-86. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0868-6.
6
[Pre-publication of clinical research protocols: pretentious or ethical need?].[临床研究方案的预发表：是自命不凡还是伦理需要？]
Rev Mal Respir. 2004 Nov;21(5 Pt 1):905-8. doi: 10.1016/s0761-8425(04)71471-0.
7
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告过程中可避免的浪费。
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1341-1345. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c3020d.
8
Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.随着时间的推移，系统评价中处理发表偏倚的方法的采用率有所提高，但仍有很大的改进空间。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.022.
9
Null is beautiful: On the importance of publishing null results.“零结果”亦有其美：论发表零结果的重要性。
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jul;30(7):585. doi: 10.1177/0269881116638813.
10
Conflicts of interest may bias research into sugary drinks and obesity.利益冲突可能会使关于含糖饮料与肥胖的研究产生偏差。
BMJ. 2014 Jan 2;348:f7654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7654.
引用本文的文献
1
Predict, Control, and Replicate to Understand: How Statistics Can Foster the Fundamental Goals of Science.预测、控制与复制以实现理解：统计学如何推动科学的基本目标。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Sep 5;42(1):109-132. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-0171-8. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Why it is nonsensical to use retrospective power analyses to conduct a postmortem on your study.为何使用回顾性功效分析对你的研究进行事后剖析是毫无意义的。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Feb;20(2):408-410. doi: 10.1111/jch.13173. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
本文引用的文献
1
In Praise of Confidence Intervals: Much More Informative Than P Values Alone.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Sep;18(9):955-7. doi: 10.1111/jch.12908. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
2
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
3
Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy.迈向循证医学统计学。1：P值谬误。
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 15;130(12):995-1004. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00008.
4
The statistical basis of public policy: a paradigm shift is overdue.公共政策的统计基础：范式转变刻不容缓。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):603-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.603.
5
p values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate.P值、假设检验与似然性：一场被忽视的历史辩论对流行病学的影响
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Mar 1;137(5):485-96; discussion 497-501. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116700.
6
The role of p-values in analysing trial results.P值在分析试验结果中的作用。
Stat Med. 1993 Aug;12(15-16):1443-52; discussion 1453-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121510.
7
Clinical trials and statistical verdicts: probable grounds for appeal.临床试验与统计判定：可能的上诉理由。
Ann Intern Med. 1983 Mar;98(3):385-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-3-385.
8
Are all significant P values created equal? The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research.所有显著的P值都是一样的吗？诊断试验与临床研究的类比。
JAMA. 1987 May 8;257(18):2459-63.
Zotero 插件