• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

No Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences in the 2014 Elections After Controlling for Time-Series Autocorrelation: A Commentary on Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016).

作者信息

Tiokhin Leonid, Hruschka Daniel

机构信息

1 School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University.

2 Center for Evolution & Medicine, Arizona State University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1358-1360. doi: 10.1177/0956797616680396. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1177/0956797616680396
PMID:28548899
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
No Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences in the 2014 Elections After Controlling for Time-Series Autocorrelation: A Commentary on Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016).没有证据表明在控制时间序列自相关后，埃博拉疫情影响了2014年选举中的投票偏好：对贝尔、霍弗和沙勒（2016年）的评论
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1358-1360. doi: 10.1177/0956797616680396. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences, Even After Controlling (Mindfully) for Autocorrelation: Reply to Tiokhin and Hruschka (2017).有证据表明，即使在（谨慎地）控制了自相关因素之后，埃博拉疫情仍影响了投票偏好：对蒂奥欣和赫鲁施卡（2017年）的回应。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1361-1363. doi: 10.1177/0956797617718183. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
3
Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?感染与选举：埃博拉疫情是否影响了 2014 年美国联邦选举（如果有影响，具体是如何影响的）？
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):595-605. doi: 10.1177/0956797616628861. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
4
Political and medical role in the last Ebola outbreak.上一次埃博拉疫情中的政治和医学角色。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2017 Sep;58(3):E201-E202.
5
Was DR Congo's Ebola virus outbreak used as a political tool?刚果民主共和国的埃博拉病毒疫情被用作政治工具了吗？
Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30002-9.
6
The United States confronts Ebola: suasion, executive action and fragmentation.美国应对埃博拉疫情：劝说、行政行动与分歧
Health Econ Policy Law. 2017 Jan;12(1):81-104. doi: 10.1017/S1744133116000244. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
7
Perspectives on West Africa Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak, 2013-2016.2013 - 2016年西非埃博拉病毒病疫情透视
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;22(6):956-63. doi: 10.3201/eid2206.160021. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
8
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic fever--Uganda, August 2000-January 2001.美国疾病控制与预防中心。2000年8月至2001年1月乌干达埃博拉出血热疫情。
JAMA. 2001 Feb 28;285(8):1010-2.
9
Outbreak news. Ebola haemorrhagic fever, Uganda--end of the outbreak.疫情通报。乌干达埃博拉出血热疫情——疫情结束。
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2008 Mar 7;83(10):89-90.
10
[Ebola or the paradoxical memory of colonial medicine].[埃博拉或殖民医学的矛盾记忆]
Rev Med Suisse. 2014 Nov 12;10(450):2176.

引用本文的文献

1
Taking Stock and Looking Forward to the Future of Pathogen Politics in Light of New Insights and Recommendations: COVID-19 Threat Was Meaningfully Associated With Support for Liberal Policies in the United States.鉴于新的见解和建议，审视并展望病原体政治的未来：新冠疫情威胁与美国对自由主义政策的支持存在显著关联。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Oct;51(10):2031-2049. doi: 10.1177/01461672241240903. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Political Attitudes and Disease Threat: Regional Pathogen Stress Is Associated With Conservative Ideology Only for Older Individuals.政治态度与疾病威胁：区域病原体压力仅与老年个体的保守意识形态相关。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Nov;50(11):1581-1595. doi: 10.1177/01461672231183199. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Coronavirus-Related Searches on the Internet Predict COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in the Real World: A Behavioral Immune System Perspective.
互联网上与冠状病毒相关的搜索可预测现实世界中的新冠疫苗接种率：行为免疫系统视角
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):572-587. doi: 10.1177/19485506221106012. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Do Experimental Manipulations of Pathogen Avoidance Motivations Influence Conformity?实验性地操纵病原体回避动机是否会影响从众行为？
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):1051-1065. doi: 10.1177/01461672231160655. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
5
Data-driven causal analysis of observational biological time series.基于观测生物时间序列的数据分析因果关系。
Elife. 2022 Aug 19;11:e72518. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72518.
6
Too afraid to vote? The effects of COVID-19 on voting behaviour.太害怕去投票？新冠疫情对投票行为的影响。
Eur J Polit Econ. 2021 Sep;69:102012. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102012. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
7
The Advent of the COVID-19 Epidemic Did Not Affect Americans' Endorsement of Moral Foundations.新冠疫情的出现并未影响美国人对道德基础的认同。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 28;12:647858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647858. eCollection 2021.
8
Of pathogens and party lines: Social conservatism positively associates with COVID-19 precautions among U.S. Democrats but not Republicans.论病原体与党派路线：在美国民主党人中，社会保守主义与新冠疫情预防措施呈正相关，而在共和党人中则不然。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 29;16(6):e0253326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253326. eCollection 2021.
9
Why are song lyrics becoming simpler? a time series analysis of lyrical complexity in six decades of American popular music.歌词为何变得越来越简单？对美国流行音乐六十年间歌词复杂度的时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):e0244576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244576. eCollection 2021.
10
Behavioral immune system linked to responses to the threat of COVID-19.行为免疫系统与对新冠病毒威胁的反应有关。
Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Dec 1;167:110221. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110221. Epub 2020 Jul 1.