Suppr超能文献

使用支持蓝牙的电子烟对电子烟使用进行生态瞬时评估与直接测量的比较:一项试点研究。

Comparison of Ecological Momentary Assessment Versus Direct Measurement of E-Cigarette Use With a Bluetooth-Enabled E-Cigarette: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Pearson Jennifer L, Elmasry Hoda, Das Babita, Smiley Sabrina L, Rubin Leslie F, DeAtley Teresa, Harvey Emily, Zhou Yitong, Niaura Raymond, Abrams David B

机构信息

Truth Initiative, Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Washington, DC, United States.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 29;6(5):e84. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6501.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing the frequency and intensity of e-cigarette use presents special challenges beyond those posed by cigarette use. Accurate measurement of e-cigarette consumption, puff duration, and the stability of these measures over time will be informative for estimating the behavioral and health effects of e-cigarette use.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the accuracy of self-reported e-cigarette puff counts collected via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to objective puff count data collected by a Bluetooth-enabled e-cigarette device and to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using a second-generation e-cigarette among adult smokers.

METHODS

A total of 5 adult smokers were enrolled in a longitudinal parent study assessing how e-cigarette use affects cigarette use among e-cigarette-naïve smokers. Using a text message-based EMA system, participants reported e-cigarette puffs for 2 weeks. Participants were also given a Bluetooth-enabled e-cigarette (Smokio) that passively collected puff counts and puff duration. Comparisons between mean reports of Smokio (device-report) and EMA (self-report) use were evaluated using paired t tests. Correlation and agreement between device- and self-reports were evaluated using Pearson correlation and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), respectively. A linear mixed effect model was used to determine the fixed effect of timing and Smokio-reported daily puffs on report accuracy. We examined the relationship between time of day and reporting accuracy using Tukey's test for multiple pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 5 African American participants, 4 men and 1 woman, who ranged in age from 24 to 59 years completed the study, resulting in 5180 observations (device-report) of e-cigarette use. At baseline, participants reported smoking for 5 to 25 years and consumed a mean of 7 to 13 cigarettes per day (CPD); 4 smoked within 30 minutes of waking. At the 30-day follow-up, CPD range decreased to 1 to 3 cigarettes; 4 participants reported past 7-day e-cigarette use, and 1 participant reported no cigarette smoking in the past 7 days. Over 2 weeks of e-cigarette use, participants took an average of 1074 e-cigarette (SD 779.0) puffs per person as captured by the device reports. Each participant took a mean of 75.0 (SD 58.8) puffs per day, with each puff lasting an average of 3.6 (SD 2.4) seconds. Device reports captured an average of 33.3 (SD 47.8) more puffs per person per day than the self-reported e-cigarette puffs. In 87% of days, participants underestimated the number of puffs they had taken on the Smokio. There was significant moderate correlation (r=.47, P<.001) but poor agreement (p=0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.46) between the device- and self-reported data. Reporting accuracy was affected by amount and timing of e-cigarette use.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to self-reported e-cigarette use, the Bluetooth-enabled device captured significantly more e-cigarette use and allowed for examination of puff duration in addition to puff counts. A Bluetooth-enabled e-cigarette is a powerful and feasible tool for objective collection of e-cigarette use behavior in the real world.

摘要

背景

评估电子烟使用的频率和强度带来了一些特殊挑战,这些挑战超出了香烟使用所带来的挑战。准确测量电子烟的消耗量、抽吸持续时间以及这些测量值随时间的稳定性,将有助于估计电子烟使用的行为和健康影响。

目的

本试点研究的目的是比较通过生态瞬时评估(EMA)收集的自我报告的电子烟抽吸次数与通过支持蓝牙的电子烟设备收集的客观抽吸次数数据的准确性,并检验在成年吸烟者中使用第二代电子烟的可行性和可接受性。

方法

共有5名成年吸烟者参加了一项纵向母体研究,该研究评估了电子烟使用对初次使用电子烟的吸烟者中香烟使用的影响。使用基于短信的EMA系统,参与者报告了2周内的电子烟抽吸次数。参与者还获得了一个支持蓝牙的电子烟(Smokio),该设备被动收集抽吸次数和抽吸持续时间。使用配对t检验评估Smokio(设备报告)和EMA(自我报告)使用的平均报告之间的比较。分别使用Pearson相关性和一致性相关系数(CCC)评估设备报告和自我报告之间的相关性和一致性。使用线性混合效应模型确定时间和Smokio报告的每日抽吸次数对报告准确性的固定效应。我们使用Tukey多重成对比较检验检查一天中的时间与报告准确性之间的关系。

结果

共有5名非裔美国参与者,4名男性和1名女性,年龄在24至59岁之间,完成了该研究,产生了5180次电子烟使用的观察结果(设备报告)。在基线时,参与者报告吸烟5至25年,平均每天消耗7至13支香烟(CPD);4人在醒来后30分钟内吸烟。在30天的随访中,CPD范围降至1至3支香烟;4名参与者报告了过去7天使用电子烟的情况,1名参与者报告在过去7天内未吸烟。在2周的电子烟使用期间,根据设备报告,参与者每人平均抽吸1074次电子烟(标准差779.0)。每位参与者每天平均抽吸75.0次(标准差58.8),每次抽吸平均持续3.6秒(标准差2.4)。设备报告显示,每人每天捕获的抽吸次数比自我报告的电子烟抽吸次数平均多33.3次(标准差47.8)。在87%的日子里,参与者低估了他们在Smokio上的抽吸次数。设备报告和自我报告的数据之间存在显著的中度相关性(r = 0.47,P < 0.001),但一致性较差(p = 0.31,95%CI 0.15 - 0.46)。报告准确性受电子烟使用量和时间的影响。

结论

与自我报告的电子烟使用情况相比,支持蓝牙的设备捕获的电子烟使用量显著更多,并且除了抽吸次数外,还可以检查抽吸持续时间。支持蓝牙的电子烟是在现实世界中客观收集电子烟使用行为的强大且可行的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验