Hunt Paul
Professor at the Law Department and Human Rights Centre, University of Essex, United Kingdom.
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):109-130.
This article tracks the shifting place of the international right to health, and human rights-based approaches to health, in the scholarly literature and United Nations (UN). From 1993 to 1994, the focus began to move from the right to health toward human rights-based approaches to health, including human rights guidance adopted by UN agencies in relation to specific health issues. There is a compelling case for a human rights-based approach to health, but it runs the risk of playing down the right to health, as evidenced by an examination of some UN human rights guidance. The right to health has important and distinctive qualities that are not provided by other rights-consequently, playing down the right to health can diminish rights-based approaches to health, as well as the right to health itself. Because general comments, the reports of UN Special Rapporteurs, and UN agencies' guidance are exercises in interpretation, I discuss methods of legal interpretation. I suggest that the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights permits distinctive interpretative methods within the boundaries established by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. I call for the right to health to be placed explicitly at the center of a rights-based approach and interpreted in accordance with public international law and international human rights law.
本文追溯了国际健康权以及基于人权的健康问题处理方法在学术文献和联合国(UN)中的地位变化。从1993年到1994年,关注点开始从健康权转向基于人权的健康问题处理方法,包括联合国机构针对特定健康问题所采用的人权指导方针。基于人权的健康问题处理方法有令人信服的理由,但正如对一些联合国人权指导方针的审视所表明的那样,它存在淡化健康权的风险。健康权具有重要且独特的性质,这是其他权利所不具备的——因此,淡化健康权会削弱基于权利的健康问题处理方法,以及健康权本身。由于一般性意见、联合国特别报告员的报告以及联合国机构的指导方针都是解释性的工作,所以我讨论了法律解释的方法。我认为《经济、社会及文化权利国际公约》在《维也纳条约法公约》所确立的范围内允许采用独特的解释方法。我呼吁将健康权明确置于基于权利的方法的核心位置,并根据国际公法和国际人权法进行解释。