Suppr超能文献

颈椎椎板成形术:其在治疗神经根型颈椎病中的作用。

Cervical laminaplasty: its role in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

作者信息

Herkowitz H N

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beamont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord. 1988;1(3):179-88.

PMID:2856537
Abstract

Krita in 1968 described the use of laminaplasty for the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Since then, several authors have modified this technique, settling on the "expansive open door laminaplasty" as the technique of choice for cervical myelopathy. There have been no reports to date on the use of the cervical laminaplasty procedure for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. The purpose of this paper is to report on the initial 16 patients undergoing this procedure for the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy due to cervical spondylosis and/or cervical spinal stenosis. There were 16 patients (8 males and 8 females) whose age ranged from 54 to 84 years, with a mean of 67.2 years. The follow-up average was 2.7 years, with a range of 2.1 to 5.5 years. Seven patients were categorized as having brachalgia-cord type myelopathy and nine patients were categorized as radiculopathy only. Arm pain was unilateral in seven patients and bilateral in nine patients. Of those with bilateral pain, eight patients had pain predominately in one arm, with one patient having equal left and right arm complaints. Cervical laminaplasty was carried out from C3-6 in six patients and C3-7 in six patients and one patient had each of the following: C4-7, C4-T1, C5-T1, and C3-T1. The results were excellent in five cases, good in nine, and poor in two. The results of patients with unilateral symptoms and signs were compared to those with bilateral findings using chi 2 analysis. There was no statistical difference when performing laminaplasty for patients with bilateral findings as opposed to unilateral symptoms and signs. The amount of spinal canal expansion obtained by the laminaplasty procedure ranged from 4 to 12 mm. The conclusions of this study were (a) laminaplasty appears to be an effective alternative to laminectomy or anterior cervical fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy and (b) complications of anterior fusion and laminectomy are avoided with the laminoplasty procedure.

摘要

克里塔在1968年描述了使用椎板成形术治疗颈椎病性脊髓病。从那时起,几位作者对该技术进行了改进,最终确定“扩大开门式椎板成形术”为颈椎病性脊髓病的首选技术。迄今为止,尚无关于使用颈椎椎板成形术治疗神经根型颈椎病的报道。本文的目的是报告最初16例因颈椎病和/或颈椎管狭窄而接受该手术治疗神经根型颈椎病的患者情况。有16例患者(8例男性和8例女性),年龄在54至84岁之间,平均年龄为67.2岁。平均随访时间为2.7年,范围为2.1至5.5年。7例患者被归类为臂痛型脊髓病,9例患者仅被归类为神经根病。7例患者手臂疼痛为单侧,9例患者为双侧。在双侧疼痛的患者中,8例患者主要在一侧手臂疼痛,1例患者左右手臂疼痛程度相同。6例患者的颈椎椎板成形术从C3 - 6进行,6例患者从C3 - 7进行,1例患者分别进行了以下手术:C4 - 7、C4 - T1、C5 - T1和C3 - T1。结果为5例优秀,9例良好,2例差。使用卡方分析比较了单侧症状和体征患者与双侧症状和体征患者的结果。对于双侧症状和体征的患者进行椎板成形术与单侧症状和体征的患者相比,没有统计学差异。椎板成形术获得的椎管扩大量为4至12毫米。本研究的结论是:(a)对于多节段颈椎病性神经根病或脊髓神经根病,椎板成形术似乎是椎板切除术或颈椎前路融合术的有效替代方法;(b)椎板成形术可避免前路融合术和椎板切除术的并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验