Charlesworth Deborah, Barton Nicholas H, Charlesworth Brian
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.
Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg 3400, Austria.
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 May 31;284(1855). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2864.
The role of natural selection in the evolution of adaptive phenotypes has undergone constant probing by evolutionary biologists, employing both theoretical and empirical approaches. As Darwin noted, natural selection can act together with other processes, including random changes in the frequencies of phenotypic differences that are not under strong selection, and changes in the environment, which may reflect evolutionary changes in the organisms themselves. As understanding of genetics developed after 1900, the new genetic discoveries were incorporated into evolutionary biology. The resulting general principles were summarized by Julian Huxley in his 1942 book Here, we examine how recent advances in genetics, developmental biology and molecular biology, including epigenetics, relate to today's understanding of the evolution of adaptations. We illustrate how careful genetic studies have repeatedly shown that apparently puzzling results in a wide diversity of organisms involve processes that are consistent with neo-Darwinism. They do not support important roles in adaptation for processes such as directed mutation or the inheritance of acquired characters, and therefore no radical revision of our understanding of the mechanism of adaptive evolution is needed.
自然选择在适应性表型进化中的作用,一直以来都受到进化生物学家的不断探究,他们采用了理论和实证两种方法。正如达尔文所指出的,自然选择可以与其他过程共同起作用,包括表型差异频率的随机变化(这些差异不在强烈选择之下)以及环境变化,而环境变化可能反映了生物体自身的进化改变。随着1900年后遗传学的发展,新的遗传学发现被纳入了进化生物学。由此产生的一般原则由朱利安·赫胥黎在他1942年的著作中进行了总结。在这里,我们探讨遗传学、发育生物学和分子生物学(包括表观遗传学)的最新进展如何与当今对适应性进化的理解相关。我们举例说明,细致的遗传学研究如何反复表明,在各种各样的生物体中看似令人困惑的结果所涉及的过程与新达尔文主义是一致的。它们并不支持定向突变或获得性性状遗传等过程在适应中起重要作用,因此不需要对我们对适应性进化机制的理解进行彻底修订。