Medicine, public health and the populist radical right.
作者信息
Greer Scott L
机构信息
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2017 Aug;110(8):305-308. doi: 10.1177/0141076817712250. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Medicine, public health and the populist radical right.医学、公共卫生与民粹主义极右翼势力。
J R Soc Med. 2017 Aug;110(8):305-308. doi: 10.1177/0141076817712250. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Political parties matter: the impact of the populist radical right on health.政党很重要：民粹主义激进右翼对健康的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Nov 1;28(suppl_3):15-18. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky157.
3
Getting the Problem Definition Right: The Radical Right, Populism, Nativism and Public Health Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".正确定义问题：极右翼、民粹主义、本土主义与公共卫生 评“民粹主义极右翼政党对欧洲福利政策的影响及其对人口健康的影响的范围综述”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 1;10(8):523-527. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.143.
4
Researching the Welfare Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".研究民粹主义激进右翼政党对福利的影响 评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对福利政策的影响及其对欧洲人口健康的影响的范围综述”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 1;10(8):516-518. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.125.
5
Are Populist Leaders Creating the Conditions for the Spread of COVID-19? Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".民粹主义领导人是否为 COVID-19 的传播创造了条件？评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对欧洲福利政策的影响及其对人口健康的影响的范围综述”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 1;10(8):511-515. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.124.
6
"Enemies of the People?" Public Health in the Era of Populist Politics Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy".“人民公敌”？民粹主义政治时代的公共卫生 评“后真相民粹主义在多元自由民主国家的兴起：对卫生政策的挑战”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):669-672. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.46.
7
Who Deserves Welfare and Who Does Not? Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".谁应享受福利，谁不应享受福利？评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对欧洲福利政策的影响及其对人口健康的影响的范围综述”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):594-597. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.174.
8
Welfare Chauvinism, Populist Radical Right Parties and Health Inequalities Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".福利沙文主义、民粹主义激进右翼政党与健康不平等 评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对福利政策的影响及其对欧洲人口健康的影响的范围综述”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):581-584. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.149.
9
Taking the Relationship Between Populism and Healthcare Seriously: A Call for Empirical Analysis Rather Than Moral Condemnation Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".认真对待民粹主义与医疗保健之间的关系：呼吁进行实证分析而不是道德谴责——评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对欧洲福利政策的影响及其对人口健康的影响的范围综述”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):598-601. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.180.
10
Issue Competition and the Social Construction of Target Populations: Alternative Suggestions for the Study of the Influence of Populist Radical Right Parties on Health Policy and Health Outcomes Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties' Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe".问题竞争与目标人群的社会建构：对民粹主义激进右翼政党对卫生政策和健康结果影响的研究的另一种建议 评“民粹主义激进右翼政党对福利政策的影响及其对欧洲人口健康的影响的范围综述”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):591-593. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.157.
引用本文的文献
1
Measles outbreaks in the United States in 2025: Practice, policy, and the canary in the coalmine.2025年美国的麻疹疫情：实践、政策与煤矿中的金丝雀
New Microbes New Infect. 2025 May 5;65:101591. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2025.101591. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macrocorrelation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years.再分配对我们的健康有益吗？检验过去 40 年来欧盟各国福利慷慨程度与健康之间的宏观关联。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11257040.
3
Does highlighting COVID-19 disparities reduce or increase vaccine intentions? evidence from a survey experiment in a diverse sample in New York State prior to vaccine roll-out.在疫苗推出之前，对纽约州多样化样本进行的一项调查实验表明，突出新冠病毒差异会减少还是增加疫苗接种意愿？
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 14;17(12):e0277043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277043. eCollection 2022.
4
Political Populism, Institutional Distrust and Vaccination Uptake: A Mediation Analysis.政治民粹主义、制度信任缺失与疫苗接种率：一项中介分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063265.
5
Golden Age of Medicine 2.0: Lifestyle Medicine and Planetary Health Prioritized.医学2.0的黄金时代：重视生活方式医学与地球健康
J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Jul;9(2):75-91. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.75. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Preventive Medicine for Person, Place, and Planet: Revisiting the Concept of High-Level Wellness in the Planetary Health Paradigm.人、地、星球的预防医学：在行星健康范式中重新审视高水平健康的概念。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020238.
7
Research methods for new technologies.新技术的研究方法。
J R Soc Med. 2017 Aug;110(8):303. doi: 10.1177/0141076817724926.
本文引用的文献
1
Health professionals must uphold truth and human rights.
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):6-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw243.
2
The dispossessed: a public health response to the rise of the far-right in Europe and North America.被剥夺者：对欧洲和北美的极右翼势力崛起的公共卫生应对措施。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):5-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw244.
3
What will Donald Trump's presidency mean for health? A scorecard.特朗普总统任期对健康意味着什么？记分卡。
Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):748-754. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30122-8. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
4
Why health care corruption needs a new approach.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Jul;21(3):212-4. doi: 10.1177/1355819615614870. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
Eugenics and public health in American history.美国历史上的优生学与公共卫生
Am J Public Health. 1997 Nov;87(11):1767-72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.11.1767.
Zotero 插件