Silva Bruno C, Santos Roberto S S, Drager Luciano F, Coelho Fernando M, Elias Rosilene M
Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 May 19;4:57. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00057. eCollection 2017.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in edematous states, notably in hemodialysis patients. In this population, overnight fluid shift can play an important role on the pathogenesis of OSA. The effect of compression stockings (CS) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on fluid shift is barely known. We compared the effects of CS and CPAP on fluid dynamics in a sample of patients with OSA in hemodialysis, through a randomized crossover study.
Each participant performed polysomnography (PSG) at baseline, during CPAP titration, and after 1 week of wearing CS. Neck circumference (NC) and segmental bioelectrical impedance were done before and after PSG.
Fourteen patients were studied (53 ± 9 years; 57% men; body mass index 29.7 ± 6.8 kg/m). Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) decreased from 20.8 (14.2; 39.6) at baseline to 7.9 (2.8; 25.4) during CPAP titration and to 16.7 (3.5; 28.9) events/h after wearing CS (CPAP vs. baseline, = 0.004; CS vs. baseline, = 0.017; and CPAP vs. CS, = 0.017). Nocturnal intracellular trunk water was higher after wearing CS in comparison to baseline and CPAP ( = 0.03). CS reduced the fluid accumulated in lower limbs during the day, although not significantly. Overnight fluid shift at baseline, CPAP, and CS was -183 ± 72, -343 ± 220, and -290 ± 213 ml, respectively ( = 0.006). Overnight NC increased at baseline (0.7 ± 0.4 cm), decreased after CPAP (-1.0 ± 0.4 cm), and while wearing CS (-0.4 ± 0.8 cm) (CPAP vs. baseline, < 0.0001; CS vs. baseline, = 0.001; CPAP vs. CS, = 0.01).
CS reduced AHI by avoiding fluid retention in the legs, favoring accumulation of water in the intracellular component of the trunk, thus avoiding fluid shift to reach the neck. CPAP improved OSA by exerting local pressure on upper airway, with no impact on fluid redistribution. CPAP performed significantly better than CS for both reduction of AHI and overnight reduction of NC. Complementary studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which CPAP and CS reduce NC.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)在水肿状态中很常见,尤其是在血液透析患者中。在这一人群中,夜间液体转移可能在OSA的发病机制中起重要作用。弹力袜(CS)和持续气道正压通气(CPAP)对液体转移的影响鲜为人知。我们通过一项随机交叉研究,比较了CS和CPAP对血液透析的OSA患者样本中液体动力学的影响。
每位参与者在基线、CPAP滴定期间以及佩戴CS 1周后进行多导睡眠图(PSG)检查。在PSG前后测量颈围(NC)和节段生物电阻抗。
共研究了14名患者(53±9岁;57%为男性;体重指数29.7±6.8kg/m)。呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)从基线时的20.8(14.2;39.6)降至CPAP滴定期间的7.9(2.8;25.4),佩戴CS后降至16.7(3.5;28.9)次/小时(CPAP与基线相比,P = 0.004;CS与基线相比,P = 0.017;CPAP与CS相比,P = 0.017)。与基线和CPAP相比,佩戴CS后夜间细胞内躯干水含量更高(P = 0.03)。CS减少了白天下肢积聚的液体,尽管不显著。基线、CPAP和CS时的夜间液体转移分别为-183±72、-343±220和-290±213ml(P = 0.006)。夜间NC在基线时增加(0.7±0.4cm),CPAP后减少(-1.0±0.4cm),佩戴CS时减少(-0.4±0.8cm)(CPAP与基线相比,P < 0.0001;CS与基线相比,P = 0.001;CPAP与CS相比,P = 0.01)。
CS通过避免腿部液体潴留,促进躯干细胞内成分中的水分积聚,从而避免液体转移至颈部,降低了AHI。CPAP通过对上气道施加局部压力改善OSA,对液体再分布无影响。在降低AHI和夜间降低NC方面,CPAP的效果明显优于CS。需要进行补充研究以阐明CPAP和CS降低NC的机制。