Rothkirch Marcus, Hesselmann Guido
Visual Perception Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00835. eCollection 2017.
In this perspective article, we first outline the large diversity of methods, measures, statistical analyses, and concepts in the field of the experimental study of unconscious processing. We then suggest that this diversity implies that comparisons between different studies on unconscious processing are fairly limited, especially when stimulus awareness has been assessed in different ways. Furthermore, we argue that flexible choices of methods and measures will inevitably lead to an overestimation of unconscious processes. In the concluding paragraph, we briefly present solutions and strategies for future research. We make a plea for the introduction of "best practices," similar to previous attempts to constitute practicing standards for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG).
在这篇观点文章中,我们首先概述了无意识加工实验研究领域中方法、测量、统计分析和概念的巨大多样性。然后我们指出,这种多样性意味着不同无意识加工研究之间的比较相当有限,尤其是当刺激意识以不同方式评估时。此外,我们认为方法和测量的灵活选择将不可避免地导致对无意识过程的高估。在结论段落中,我们简要介绍了未来研究的解决方案和策略。我们呼吁引入“最佳实践”,类似于之前为功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和脑电图(EEG)制定实践标准的尝试。