Christie Nicola, Steinbach Rebecca, Green Judith, Mullan M Patricia, Prior Lindsay
Centre for Transport Studies, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, WC1H 9SH, London, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 7;17(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4470-x.
Novice drivers are at relatively high risk of road traffic injury. There is good evidence that Graduated Driving Licensing (GDL) schemes reduce collisions rates, by reducing exposure to risk and by extending learning periods. Legislation for a proposed scheme in Northern Ireland was passed in 2016, providing an opportunity for future evaluation of the full public health impacts of a scheme in a European context within a natural experiment. This qualitative study was designed to inform the logic model for such an evaluation, and provide baseline qualitative data on the role of private cars in health and wellbeing.
Nine group interviews with young people aged 16-23 (N = 43) and two group interviews with parents of young people (N = 8) were conducted in a range of settings in Northern Ireland in 2015. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.
Informal car-pooling within and beyond households led to routine expectations of lift provision and uptake. Experiences of risky driving situations were widespread. In rural areas, extensive use of farm vehicles for transport needs meant many learner drivers had both early driving experience and expectations that legislation may have to be locally adapted to meet social needs. Cars were used as a site for socialising, as well as essential means of transport. Alternative modes (public transport, walking and cycling) were held in low esteem, even where available. Recall of other transport-related public health messages and parents' existing use of GDL-type restrictions suggested GDL schemes were acceptable in principle. There was growing awareness and use of in-car technologies (telematics) used by insurance companies to reward good driving.
Key issues to consider in evaluating the broader public health impact of GDL will include: changes in injury rates for licensed car occupants and other populations and modes; changes in exposure to risk in the licensed and general population; and impact on transport exclusion. We suggest an important pathway will be change in social norms around offering and accepting lifts and to risk-taking. The growing adoption of in-car telematics will have implications for future GDL programmes and for evaluation.
新手司机面临的道路交通伤害风险相对较高。有充分证据表明,分级驾驶执照(GDL)计划通过减少风险暴露和延长学习期来降低碰撞率。北爱尔兰一项拟议计划的立法于2016年获得通过,这为在自然实验的欧洲背景下对该计划的全面公共卫生影响进行未来评估提供了机会。这项定性研究旨在为这种评估的逻辑模型提供信息,并提供关于私家车在健康和福祉方面作用的基线定性数据。
2015年在北爱尔兰的一系列场所对16至23岁的年轻人进行了9次小组访谈(N = 43),对年轻人的父母进行了2次小组访谈(N = 8)。使用主题内容分析法对数据进行分析。
家庭内部和外部的非正式拼车导致了提供和接受搭车的常规期望。危险驾驶情况的经历很普遍。在农村地区,广泛使用农用车辆满足运输需求意味着许多学习驾驶者既有早期驾驶经验,也期望立法可能需要根据当地情况进行调整以满足社会需求。汽车被用作社交场所,也是必不可少的交通工具。即使有其他交通方式(公共交通、步行和骑自行车),人们对它们的评价也很低。对其他与交通相关的公共卫生信息的回忆以及父母现有的GDL类限制措施表明,GDL计划原则上是可以接受的。人们对保险公司用于奖励良好驾驶行为的车内技术(远程信息处理)的认识和使用正在增加。
在评估GDL对更广泛公共卫生影响时需要考虑的关键问题将包括:有执照的汽车乘客和其他人群及交通方式的受伤率变化;有执照人群和普通人群的风险暴露变化;以及对交通排斥的影响。我们认为一个重要的途径将是围绕提供和接受搭车以及冒险行为的社会规范的改变。车内远程信息处理技术的日益普及将对未来的GDL计划和评估产生影响。