Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Av. Antonio Carlos 6627, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 7;7(1):2992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03098-w.
Amazonian rivers are usually suggested as dispersal barriers, limiting biogeographic units. This is evident in a widely accepted Areas of Endemism (AoEs) hypothesis proposed for Amazonian birds. We empirically test this hypothesis based on quantitative analyses of species distribution. We compiled a database of bird species and subspecies distribution records, and used this dataset to identify AoEs through three different methods. Our results show that the currently accepted Amazonian AoEs are not consistent with areas identified, which were generally congruent among datasets and methods. Some Amazonian rivers represent limits of AoEs, but these areas are not congruent with those previously proposed. However, spatial variation in species composition is correlated with largest Amazonian rivers. Overall, the previously proposed Amazonian AoEs are not consistent with the evidence from bird distribution. However, the fact that major rivers coincide with breaks in species composition suggest they can act as dispersal barriers, though not necessarily for all bird taxa. This scenario indicates a more complex picture of the Amazonian bird distribution than previously imagined.
亚马逊河流域通常被认为是扩散障碍,限制了生物地理单元。这在一个广泛接受的亚马逊鸟类特有种区(AoE)假设中得到了体现。我们基于物种分布的定量分析来实证检验这一假设。我们编制了一个鸟类物种和亚种分布记录数据库,并使用该数据集通过三种不同的方法来识别 AoE。我们的结果表明,目前公认的亚马逊 AoE 与所确定的区域不一致,这些区域在数据集和方法之间通常是一致的。一些亚马逊河流域代表 AoE 的限制,但这些区域与之前提出的区域不一致。然而,物种组成的空间变化与最大的亚马逊河流域相关。总体而言,先前提出的亚马逊 AoE 与鸟类分布的证据不一致。然而,主要河流与物种组成的中断相吻合这一事实表明它们可以充当扩散障碍,尽管不一定适用于所有鸟类分类群。这种情况表明,亚马逊地区鸟类的分布比之前想象的更为复杂。