Lu Teng, Liang Hui, Liu Chao, Guo Shuai, Zhang Ting, Yang Baohui, He Xijing
Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Department of Education, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 12;23:2863-2870. doi: 10.12659/msm.905466.
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate whether obliquely angled and ring-shaped titanium mesh cage (TMC) end structures can improve the compressive load on the endplate interface in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 23 volunteers underwent cervical lateral x-ray. The oblique angle of the superior endplate was measured, which was used to construct the gradient of the TMC end. Forty-two fresh cadaveric vertebral bodies were harvested and randomly distributed among four TMC groups with different ends. The baseline indicators of bone mineral density and anteroposterior and transverse dimensions were recorded. The superior endplate was placed at an angle of 12° when performing uniaxial compression testing. The maximum loads of the four TMCs were assessed. RESULTS There were no significant differences among the groups regarding the baseline indicators. The conventional TMC had the lowest maximum load (1362.3±221.78 N, p<0.05), whereas the TMC with an obliquely end ring had the highest maximum load (2095.82±285.64 N, p<0.05). The maximum loads of the TMCs with oblique footprints and flat end ring were much higher than that of the conventional TMC (p<0.05) but significantly lower than that of the TMC with the obliquely end ring (p<0.05), with average values of 1806.91±246.98 N and 1725.3±213.33 N, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Both the ring shape and oblique angle of the TMC end contributed to an increase in compressive force and are advocated for use in TMC structure optimization to decrease the incidence of TMC subsidence in ACCF.
背景 本研究旨在评估斜角和环形钛网笼(TMC)端部结构是否能改善颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)中终板界面的压缩负荷。
材料与方法 共有23名志愿者接受了颈椎侧位X线检查。测量上位终板的倾斜角度,用于构建TMC端部的坡度。收集42个新鲜尸体椎体,并随机分配到四个具有不同端部的TMC组中。记录骨密度以及前后径和横径的基线指标。在进行单轴压缩测试时,将上位终板以12°角放置。评估四种TMC的最大负荷。
结果 各组之间的基线指标无显著差异。传统TMC的最大负荷最低(1362.3±221.78 N,p<0.05),而端部为斜环的TMC最大负荷最高(2095.82±285.64 N,p<0.05)。具有斜形底面和平端环的TMC的最大负荷远高于传统TMC(p<0.05),但显著低于端部为斜环的TMC(p<0.05),平均值分别为1806.91±246.98 N和1725.3±213.33 N。
结论 TMC端部的环形形状和斜角均有助于增加压缩力,提倡将其用于TMC结构优化,以降低ACCF中TMC下沉的发生率。