• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物类似药能否助力实现美国医疗保健改革的目标?

Can biosimilars help achieve the goals of US health care reform?

作者信息

Boccia Ralph, Jacobs Ira, Popovian Robert, de Lima Lopes Gilberto

机构信息

Center for Cancers and Blood Disorders, Bethesda, MD.

Global Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Jun 1;9:197-205. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S133442. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S133442
PMID:28615973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5459961/
Abstract

The US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) aims to expand health care coverage, contain costs, and improve health care quality. Accessibility and affordability of innovative biopharmaceuticals are important to the success of the ACA. As it is substantially more difficult to manufacture them compared with small-molecule drugs, many of which have generic alternatives, biologics may increase drug costs. However, biologics offer demonstrated improvements in patient care that can reduce expensive interventions, thus lowering net health care costs. Biosimilars, which are highly similar to their reference biologics, cost less than the originators, potentially increasing access through reduced prescription drug costs while providing equivalent therapeutic results. This review evaluates 1) the progress made toward enacting health care reform since the passage of the ACA and 2) the role of biosimilars, including the potential impact of expanded biosimilar use on access, health care costs, patient management, and outcomes. Barriers to biosimilar adoption in the USA are noted, including low awareness and financial disincentives relating to reimbursement. The evaluated evidence suggests that the ACA has partly achieved some of its aims; however, the opportunity remains to transform health care to fully achieve reform. Although the future is uncertain, increased use of biosimilars in the US health care system could help achieve expanded access, control costs, and improve the quality of care.

摘要

美国《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)旨在扩大医疗保健覆盖范围、控制成本并提高医疗保健质量。创新生物制药的可及性和可负担性对ACA的成功至关重要。与许多有通用替代药物的小分子药物相比,生物制品的生产难度要大得多,这可能会增加药品成本。然而,生物制品已证明能改善患者护理,从而减少昂贵的干预措施,进而降低医疗保健净成本。生物类似药与参照生物制品高度相似,成本低于原研药,通过降低处方药成本有可能增加可及性,同时提供等效的治疗效果。本综述评估了:1)自ACA通过以来在实施医疗保健改革方面取得的进展;2)生物类似药的作用,包括扩大生物类似药使用对可及性、医疗保健成本、患者管理和治疗结果的潜在影响。文中指出了美国生物类似药采用的障碍,包括认知度低以及与报销相关的经济抑制因素。评估证据表明,ACA部分实现了其一些目标;然而,仍有机会对医疗保健进行变革以全面实现改革。尽管未来不确定,但在美国医疗保健系统中增加生物类似药的使用有助于扩大可及性、控制成本并提高护理质量。

相似文献

1
Can biosimilars help achieve the goals of US health care reform?生物类似药能否助力实现美国医疗保健改革的目标?
Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Jun 1;9:197-205. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S133442. eCollection 2017.
2
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?对奥巴马医改的批判性分析:是可承受的医疗保健,还是惠及多数人的保险和少数人的覆盖范围?
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138.
3
The growing role of biologics and biosimilars in the United States: Perspectives from the APhA Biologics and Biosimilars Stakeholder Conference.生物制品和生物类似药在美国日益重要的作用:来自美国药师协会生物制品和生物类似药利益相关者会议的观点
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Sep-Oct;57(5):e15-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
4
The Affordable Care Act, health care reform, prescription drug formularies and utilization management tools.《平价医疗法案》、医疗保健改革、处方药处方集及使用管理工具
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):459-67. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
5
Health Care Efficiencies: Consolidation and Alternative Models vs. Health Care and Antitrust Regulation - Irreconcilable Differences?医疗保健效率:合并与替代模式与医疗保健及反垄断监管——不可调和的差异?
Am J Law Med. 2017 Nov;43(4):426-467. doi: 10.1177/0098858817753407.
6
Biosimilar Cost Savings in the United States: Initial Experience and Future Potential.美国生物类似药的成本节约:初步经验与未来潜力
Rand Health Q. 2018 Mar 30;7(4):3. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
Why Biologics and Biosimilars Remain So Expensive: Despite Two Wins for Biosimilars, the Supreme Court's Recent Rulings do not Solve Fundamental Barriers to Competition.生物制剂和生物类似药为何仍然如此昂贵:尽管生物类似药取得了两项胜利,但最高法院最近的裁决并未解决竞争的根本障碍。
Drugs. 2018 Nov;78(17):1777-1781. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1009-0.
8
Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction.生物制剂(包括生物类似药)的安全性:现状与未来方向的视角。
Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1013-1022. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0684-9.
9
Biosimilars: potential implications for clinicians.生物类似药:对临床医生的潜在影响
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Jun 17;9:135-42. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S91691. eCollection 2016.
10
Biosimilars: biologics that meet patients' needs and healthcare economics.生物类似药:满足患者需求并兼顾医疗保健经济学的生物制品。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Sep;22(13 Suppl):S439-S442.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Barriers Preventing Biosimiliar Oncology Medication Adoption.识别阻碍肿瘤生物类似药采用的因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 27;58(11):1533. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111533.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Key Consideration for Evaluating Biosimilar Uptake?类风湿关节炎患者报告的结局:评估生物类似药使用情况的关键考量因素?
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Mar 30;13:79-95. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S256715. eCollection 2022.
3
Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians.美国肿瘤单抗生物类似药的认知、使用和真实世界应用经验的演变:来自支付方和医生的观点。
BioDrugs. 2022 Jan;36(1):71-83. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
Greater uptake, an alternative reimbursement methodology needed to realize cost-saving potential of oncology biosimilars in the United States.在美国,需要更大的接受度和替代报销方法来实现肿瘤生物类似药的成本节约潜力。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Dec;27(12):1642-1651. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21202. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
5
Comparison of BRICS-TM Countries' Biosimilar Regulatory Frameworks With Australia, Canada and Switzerland: Benchmarking Best Practices.金砖五国新兴市场国家与澳大利亚、加拿大和瑞士生物类似药监管框架的比较:最佳实践基准
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 9;12:711361. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.711361. eCollection 2021.
6
Process and Clinical Outcomes of a Biosimilar Adoption Program with Infliximab-Dyyb.英夫利昔单抗地舒单抗生物类似药采用计划的流程和临床结局。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Apr;26(4):410-416. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.4.410.
7
The Breakthrough of Biosimilars: A Twist in the Narrative of Biological Therapy.生物类似药的突破:生物治疗叙事的转折。
Biomolecules. 2019 Aug 24;9(9):410. doi: 10.3390/biom9090410.
8
Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adopting Biosimilars and Achieving Goals of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act: A Survey of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Professionals.克服采用生物类似药障碍和实现生物仿制药价格竞争与创新法案目标的策略:一项对管理式医疗保健和专科药房专业人员的调查。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):904-912. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18412. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
The role of biosimilars in value-based oncology care.生物类似药在基于价值的肿瘤护理中的作用。
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Oct 17;10:4591-4602. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S164201. eCollection 2018.
10
A bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars.生物类似药全球研究的文献计量分析
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 Mar 27;11:6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0133-2. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Guidance on the Prescription Patterns of G-CSFs for the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia Following Anticancer Chemotherapy: A Population-Based Utilization Study in the Lazio Region.指南对预防抗癌化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症的粒细胞集落刺激因子处方模式的影响:拉齐奥地区基于人群的使用情况研究
BioDrugs. 2017 Apr;31(2):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0214-9.
2
Awareness, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Biosimilars Among Specialty Physicians.专科医生对生物类似药的认知、了解及看法。
Adv Ther. 2017 Jan;33(12):2160-2172. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0431-5. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Association Between Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Initiative and Payments and Quality Outcomes for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes.医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划与下肢关节置换事件的支付及质量结果之间的关联。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1267-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12717.
4
Medication Costs and Adherence of Treatment Before and After the Affordable Care Act: 1999-2015.《平价医疗法案》实施前后的药物成本与治疗依从性:1999 - 2015年
Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1804-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303269. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
5
Closing the Medicare Doughnut Hole: Changes in Prescription Drug Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Part D Coverage After the Affordable Care Act.填补医疗保险的“甜甜圈洞”:《平价医疗法案》实施后,参加D部分保险的医疗保险受益人的处方药使用情况和自付费用变化
Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):43-49. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000613.
6
Insurance Among Young Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Changes Under the Affordable Care Act Dependent Provision.患有炎症性肠病的年轻成年人的保险情况:《平价医疗法案》受抚养人条款下的变化
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Jun;64(6):962-965. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001378.
7
United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps.美国医疗保健改革:迄今取得的进展及后续步骤。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):525-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9797.
8
The Past and Future of the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》的过去与未来
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):497-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10158.
9
The Future of the Affordable Care Act: Reassessment and Revision.《平价医疗法案》的未来:重新评估与修订
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):495-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9881.
10
US Health Care Reform: Cost Containment and Improvement in Quality.美国医疗保健改革:成本控制与质量提升
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):493-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9876.