Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚患者接触……的证据。 (原文中“to”后面缺少具体内容)

Evidence of exposure to in Australian patients.

作者信息

Teoh Yen Thon, Hii Sze Fui, Graves Stephen, Rees Robert, Stenos John, Traub Rebecca J

机构信息

Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

The Australian Rickettsial Reference Laboratory, University Hospital, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.

出版信息

One Health. 2016 Jun 4;2:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Abstract

is an emerging zoonosis, causing flea-borne spotted fever (FBSF). Serological diagnosis is typically confounded by cross-reactivity with typhus group rickettsiae and prior to the development of specific serological methods, cases of FBSF in Australia were misdiagnosed. Patient sera tested between August 2010 and December 2013 and known to be seropositive to by immunofluorescence antibody testing (IFAT) were subsequently retested against using an -specific IFAT. Sera of 49 patients were of a sufficient quality to be included in re-analysis. A classification of FBSF and murine typhus (MT) was attributed to fourteen and seven patients respectively, based on a minimum four-fold higher antibody titre to than to and vice versa. Twenty-eight patients were classified as indeterminate for either or (antibody titres within two-fold of one another). Historically, it is likely that Australian patients clinically ill with FBSF were misdiagnosed. It is important that medical practitioners consider FBSF as part of their differential diagnoses, and obtain relevant history with regard to patient's exposure to domestic pets and their fleas. Australian microbiology diagnostic laboratories should include serological testing for as part of the diagnostic panel for febrile diseases. Veterinarians are encouraged to increase their awareness of this emerging zoonosis and advocate flea control in pets.

摘要

是一种新出现的人畜共患病,可引起蚤传斑点热(FBSF)。血清学诊断通常因与斑疹伤寒群立克次体的交叉反应而混淆,在特异性血清学方法开发之前,澳大利亚的FBSF病例被误诊。对2010年8月至2013年12月期间检测的已知通过免疫荧光抗体检测(IFAT)对[具体病原体1]血清反应阳性的患者血清,随后使用针对[具体病原体1]的特异性IFAT针对[具体病原体2]进行重新检测。49名患者的血清质量足以纳入重新分析。根据对[具体病原体1]的抗体滴度比对[具体病原体2]至少高四倍以及反之亦然,分别将14名和7名患者归类为FBSF和鼠型斑疹伤寒(MT)。28名患者被归类为对[具体病原体1]或[具体病原体2]不确定(抗体滴度彼此相差两倍以内)。从历史上看,临床上患有FBSF的澳大利亚患者很可能被误诊。重要的是,医生应将FBSF作为鉴别诊断的一部分加以考虑,并获取患者接触家养宠物及其跳蚤的相关病史。澳大利亚微生物学诊断实验室应将针对[具体病原体1]的血清学检测作为发热性疾病诊断检测项目的一部分。鼓励兽医提高对这种新出现的人畜共患病的认识,并倡导对宠物进行跳蚤控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/805c/5441329/7a0d7e64002d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验