Shaw Richard John, Čukić Iva, Deary Ian J, Gale Catharine R, Chastin Sebastien Fm, Dall Philippa M, Skelton Dawn A, Der Geoff
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Psychology Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e016436. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016436.
To investigate whether sedentary behaviour in older adults is associated with a systematic and comprehensive range of socioeconomic position (SEP) measures across the life course. SEP measures included prospective measures of social class, income, educational qualifications and parental social class and contemporaneous measures of area deprivation.
Glasgow and the surrounding (West of Scotland) combined with Edinburgh and the surrounding area (the Lothians).
Community-dwelling adults aged around 79, 83, and 64 years from, respectively, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936) (n=271) and the 1930s (n=119) and 1950s (n=310) cohorts of the West of Scotland Twenty-07 study.
Sedentary behaviour was measured objectively using an activPAL activity monitor worn continuously for 7 days and used to calculate percentage of waking time spent sedentary.
Among retired participants, for most cohort and SEP combinations, greater social disadvantage was associated with increased sedentary time. For example, in the Twenty-07 1930s cohort, those most deprived on the Carstairs measure spent 6.5% (95% CI 0.3 to 12.7) more of their waking time sedentary than the least deprived. However, for employed people, the relationship between SEP and sedentary behaviour was much weaker. For example, in terms of social class differences, among the retired, the most disadvantaged spent 5.7% more waking time sedentary (95% CI 2.6% to 87%), whereas among the employed, there was effectively no difference (-0.5%; 95% CI -9.0 to 8.0).
Diverse SEP measures were associated with increased sedentary behaviour among retired people. There was little evidence for a relationship between SEP measures and sedentary behaviour among employed older adults. Prior to retirement, the constraints of the workplace may be masking effects that are only apparent at weekends.
调查老年人的久坐行为是否与一生中一系列系统且全面的社会经济地位(SEP)测量指标相关。SEP测量指标包括社会阶层、收入、教育程度和父母社会阶层的前瞻性测量指标,以及地区贫困程度的同期测量指标。
格拉斯哥及其周边地区(苏格兰西部)与爱丁堡及其周边地区(洛锡安)。
分别来自洛锡安出生队列1936(LBC1936)(n = 271)以及苏格兰西部二十-07研究中20世纪30年代(n = 119)和50年代(n = 310)队列的约79岁、83岁和64岁的社区居住成年人。
使用activPAL活动监测仪客观测量久坐行为,该监测仪连续佩戴7天,用于计算久坐时间占清醒时间的百分比。
在退休参与者中,对于大多数队列和SEP组合,社会劣势越大,久坐时间越长。例如,在二十-07研究的20世纪30年代队列中,在卡斯尔斯测量中最贫困的人群比最不贫困的人群久坐时间多6.5%(95%CI 0.3%至12.7%)。然而,对于在职人员,SEP与久坐行为之间的关系要弱得多。例如,就社会阶层差异而言,退休人员中最弱势的人群久坐时间多5.7%(95%CI 2.6%至87%),而在职人员中实际上没有差异(-0.5%;95%CI -9.0%至8.0%)。
多种SEP测量指标与退休人员久坐行为增加有关。几乎没有证据表明SEP测量指标与在职老年人的久坐行为之间存在关系。在退休前,工作场所的限制可能掩盖了仅在周末才明显的影响。