• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激呈现与大小对偏好的影响。

The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.

作者信息

Moore James W, Radley Keith C, Dart Evan H, Whipple Heather M, Ness Emily J, Murphy Ashley N, Furlow Chris, Wimberly Joy K, Smith Ashley

机构信息

Applied Behavior Analysis Program, Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive, Box 5025, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Sep 21;10(2):172-177. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0148-6. eCollection 2017 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s40617-016-0148-6
PMID:28630822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5459764/
Abstract

The impact of stimulus size and presentation on choice during a preference assessment was investigated using a modified multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) technique. Stimuli were either presented with a uniform magnitude, as determined by mass, or in a manner consistent with caregiver report of reinforcer consumption. While both assessment procedures identified the same top three preferred items in three out of five cases, greater variability in the preference rank of less preferred items was observed between assessments.

摘要

使用改良的无替换多刺激(MSWO)技术,研究了刺激大小和呈现方式对偏好评估期间选择的影响。刺激要么以由质量决定的统一大小呈现,要么以与照顾者关于强化物消耗的报告一致的方式呈现。虽然两种评估程序在五分之三的案例中都确定了相同的前三项偏好项目,但在评估之间观察到较不偏好项目的偏好排名存在更大的变异性。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.刺激呈现与大小对偏好的影响。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Sep 21;10(2):172-177. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0148-6. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Comparing the results of one-session, two-session, and three-session MSWO preference assessments.比较单次、双次和三次 MSWO 偏好评估的结果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):700-712. doi: 10.1002/jaba.808. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
3
Validity of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items.无替换多选偏好评估法在可食用物品评估中的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1688-1701. doi: 10.1002/jaba.703. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
4
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.评估用于评估强化物偏好的多重刺激呈现形式。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
5
Using Pictures Depicting App Icons to Conduct an MSWO Preference Assessment on a Tablet Device.使用描绘应用程序图标的图片在平板电脑设备上进行改良单一刺激偏好评估。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 Oct 30;12(2):335-342. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00309-2. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
An evaluation of preference stability within MSWO preference assessments for children with autism.对自闭症儿童的 MSWO 偏好评估中的偏好稳定性进行评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):638-655. doi: 10.1002/jaba.988. Epub 2023 May 11.
7
Assessing Preference and Stability of Preference for Individuals with Neurocognitive Disorder.评估神经认知障碍患者的偏好及偏好稳定性。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Sep 30;15(3):782-795. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00648-7. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
A multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment for sexual partners: Test-retest stability.性伴侣的多重非替换刺激评估:重测稳定性
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Oct;55(4):1059-1067. doi: 10.1002/jaba.936. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
9
Assessing Preferences for Animals in Children with Autism: A New Use for Video-Based Preference Assessment.评估自闭症儿童对动物的偏好:基于视频的偏好评估的新用途。
Front Vet Sci. 2017 Mar 10;4:29. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00029. eCollection 2017.
10
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral economics: a tutorial for behavior analysts in practice.行为经济学:面向行为分析师从业者的教程。
Behav Anal Pract. 2013 Spring;6(1):34-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03391790.
2
Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.分布式和累积强化安排:疗效和偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):293-313. doi: 10.1002/jaba.116. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
On the correspondence between preference assessment outcomes and progressive-ratio schedule assessments of stimulus value.偏好评估结果与刺激价值递增比率评估之间的一致性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):729-33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-729.
4
The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.短暂和延长刺激可获得性对偏好的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):767-72. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.767-772.
5
The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than.根据多于和少于的关系框架对结果性功能进行转换。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):317-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.113-04.
6
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.评估用于评估强化物偏好的多重刺激呈现形式。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
7
Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.整合照顾者报告与系统的选择评估以加强强化物识别。
Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15-25.
8
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
9
Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.对重度残疾学生强化物偏好的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):173-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-173.