Roccatello Dario, Sciascia Savino, Rossi Daniela, Naretto Carla, Bazzan Mario, Solfietti Laura, Baldovino Simone, Menegatti Elisa
Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, Center of Research of Immunopathology and Rare Diseases-Coordinating Center of the Network for Rare Diseases of Piedmont and Aosta Valley, University of Turin, San Giovanni Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, S. Giovanni Bosco Hospital and University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e015243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015243.
We aim to evaluate the safety of performing percutaneous native kidney biopsy (PKB) as an outpatient procedure (implying an observation period of 6 hours) compared with the traditional inpatient policy.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Group I, in whom PKB was performed in the outpatient department (2012-2016) and followed by 6 hours' observation period and then by regular outpatient visits and group II, in whom PKB was performed and followed by at least 1 day hospital admission. Group II included retrospectively retrieved patients who underwent PKB in our Institution between January 2000 and November 2012 as an inpatient procedure. All biopsies were performed by a single nephrologist following a structured protocol.
462 biopsies were reviewed, 210 (45.5%) of patients were women and the mean age was 54.7±17.9 years. One hundred and twenty-nine (27.9%) of these biopsies were performed in outpatients. A total of 36 (7.8%) of patients developed a complication, and of those, 9 (1.9%) suffered for a major complication (arteriovenous fistula (six cases, 1.2%), ischaemic stroke (2; 0.4%), thromboembolic pulmonary embolism (1; 0.2%)) and 27 (5.8%) for minor(macroscopic haematuria (12 cases, 2.6%), haematomas on sonography not requiring intervention (15 cases, 3.2%)). When comparing the complication rate between groups I and II, no statical difference was observed. When analysing together both groups, after multivariate analysis, serum creatinine >3 mg/dL (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.18 to 6.81) and known severe hypertension (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.7) were found to be independent risk factors for minor and major complications, respectively. Conversely, we found no association of risk with the number of biopsy passes, gender, age, diagnosis, presence of haematuria before the kidney biopsy nor the degree of proteinuria.
Outpatient biopsy could be a valuable, safe and perhaps cost-effective method of obtaining diagnostic renal tissue in the majority of patients.
我们旨在评估与传统住院策略相比,门诊进行经皮肾穿刺活检术(PKB)(即观察期为6小时)的安全性。
设计、地点、参与者和测量方法:第一组患者于门诊接受经皮肾穿刺活检术(2012 - 2016年),随后进行6小时观察,然后定期门诊随访;第二组患者接受经皮肾穿刺活检术后至少住院1天。第二组包括回顾性纳入的2000年1月至2012年11月期间在我们机构接受住院经皮肾穿刺活检术的患者。所有活检均由一名肾脏病医生按照结构化方案进行。
共审查了462例活检病例,其中210例(45.5%)为女性,平均年龄为54.7±17.9岁。其中129例(27.9%)活检在门诊患者中进行。共有36例(7.8%)患者出现并发症,其中9例(1.9%)发生严重并发症(动静脉瘘6例(1.2%)、缺血性中风2例(0.4%)、血栓栓塞性肺栓塞1例(0.2%)),27例(5.8%)发生轻微并发症(肉眼血尿12例(2.6%)、超声检查发现血肿但无需干预15例(3.2%))。比较第一组和第二组的并发症发生率,未观察到统计学差异。对两组进行综合分析,多因素分析后发现,血清肌酐>3mg/dL(比值比2.03,95%置信区间1.18至6.81)和已知严重高血压(比值比2.01,95%置信区间1.2至4.7)分别是轻微和严重并发症的独立危险因素。相反,我们发现并发症风险与活检针数、性别、年龄、诊断、肾活检前血尿的存在情况或蛋白尿程度无关。
门诊活检可能是大多数患者获取诊断性肾组织的一种有价值、安全且可能具有成本效益的方法。