Kennedy Caitlin E, Haberlen Sabina A, Narasimhan Manjulaa
Departments of International Health and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e015310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015310.
To review and critically appraise the existing evidence on integration of sexually transmitted infection (STI) services into HIV care and treatment services for women living with HIV.
Systematic review.
Four electronic databases were searched through 16February 2017 using keywords for HIV, STIs and integration. Reference lists of included articles and other reviews were also screened.
We included studies that compared women living with HIV who received STI services integrated into HIV care and treatment services with those who received HIV care and treatment services without integrated STI services or standard of care.
Of 170 articles identified, 3 studies reported in 4 articles were included. Two studies evaluated comprehensive care for people living with HIV in the UK; in both cases, quality and uptake of STI services seemed to improve following integration. The third study conducted a comparative case study across different models of care in Swaziland: two clinics integrated with sexual and reproductive health services (including STI services), and two stand-alone HIV clinics (without STI services). Coverage for Pap smears among women living with HIV was higher at the fully integrated site, but there was no significant difference in the prevalence of sexual health screening or advice on sexual health. Reported client satisfaction was generally higher at the stand-alone HIV clinic, and a diverse range of factors related to implementation of different care models challenged the notion that integrated services are always superior or desired.
While there is a limited evidence base for integrating STI services into HIV care and treatment services, existing studies indicate that integration is feasible and has the potential for positive outcomes. However, diverse population needs and health system factors must be considered when designing models of care to provide STI services to women living with HIV.
回顾并严格评估关于将性传播感染(STI)服务纳入感染HIV女性的HIV护理和治疗服务的现有证据。
系统评价。
通过使用HIV、性传播感染和整合的关键词,检索了四个电子数据库至2017年2月16日。还筛选了纳入文章的参考文献列表和其他综述。
我们纳入了将接受整合了性传播感染服务的HIV护理和治疗服务的感染HIV女性与接受未整合性传播感染服务或标准护理的HIV护理和治疗服务的女性进行比较的研究。
在识别出的170篇文章中,纳入了4篇文章中报道的3项研究。两项研究评估了英国HIV感染者的综合护理;在这两个案例中,整合后性传播感染服务的质量和利用率似乎有所提高。第三项研究在斯威士兰对不同护理模式进行了比较案例研究:两家诊所与性健康和生殖健康服务(包括性传播感染服务)整合,两家独立的HIV诊所(没有性传播感染服务)。在完全整合的地点,感染HIV女性的巴氏涂片覆盖率更高,但性健康筛查的患病率或性健康建议方面没有显著差异。报告的客户满意度在独立的HIV诊所通常更高,与不同护理模式实施相关的各种因素对整合服务总是更优越或更受欢迎的观念提出了挑战。
虽然将性传播感染服务纳入HIV护理和治疗服务的证据基础有限,但现有研究表明整合是可行的,并且有可能产生积极结果。然而,在设计为感染HIV女性提供性传播感染服务的护理模式时,必须考虑不同人群的需求和卫生系统因素。