Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Stress Health. 2018 Feb;34(1):102-114. doi: 10.1002/smi.2765. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
In 3 studies, we developed and tested the first comprehensive, self-report measure of workplace interruptions. The Workplace Interruptions Measure (WIM) is based on a typology of interruptions that included intrusions, distractions, discrepancy detections, and breaks. The four-factor structure was reduced to a 12-item measure in Study 1 (N = 317) and confirmed in a diverse sample of employees in Study 2 (N = 160). Study 3 (N = 323) further examined the psychometric properties of the WIM in a sample of university faculty and staff. Studies 2 and 3 demonstrated that both effort-enhancing interruptions (intrusions, distractions, and discrepancy detections) and recovery-enhancing interruptions (breaks) were associated with stressors and strains. Distractions, discrepancy detections, and breaks uniquely predicted strain outcomes beyond other workplace stressors (i.e., quantitative workload, interpersonal conflict, and role conflict). We discuss implications of the WIM for the theory and practice of interruptions research.
在三项研究中,我们开发并测试了首个全面的、用于评估工作场所干扰的自我报告式测量工具。工作场所干扰测量表(WIM)基于干扰的类型学,其中包括干扰、分心、差异检测和休息。在研究 1(N=317)中,将四因素结构简化为 12 项测量,在研究 2(N=160)中,在不同员工样本中得到了验证。研究 3(N=323)在大学教职员工样本中进一步检验了 WIM 的心理测量特性。研究 2 和研究 3 表明,增强努力的干扰(干扰、分心和差异检测)和增强恢复的干扰(休息)都与压力源和压力有关。分心、差异检测和休息除了其他工作场所压力源(即定量工作量、人际冲突和角色冲突)之外,还能独特地预测压力结果。我们讨论了 WIM 对干扰研究理论和实践的意义。