Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital/Warren Alpert, Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Savjani Institute for Health Research, Windham, Maine, USA.
Genet Med. 2017 Nov;19(11):1187-1201. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.30. Epub 2017 May 18.
PurposeA pilot systematic evidence review to establish methodology utility in rare genetic diseases, support clinical recommendations, and identify important knowledge gaps.MethodsBroad-based published/gray-literature searches through December 2015 for studies of males with confirmed mucopolysaccharidosis type II (any age, phenotype, genotype, family history) treated with enzyme replacement therapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Preset inclusion criteria employed for abstract and full document selection, and standardized methods for data extraction and assessment of quality and strength of evidence.ResultsTwelve outcomes reported included benefits of urinary glycosaminoglycan and liver/spleen volume reductions and harms of immunoglobulin G/neutralizing antibody development (moderate strength of evidence). Less clear were benefits of improved 6-minute walk tests, height, early treatment, and harms of other adverse reactions (low strength of evidence). Benefits and harms of other outcomes were unclear (insufficient strength of evidence). Current benefits and harms of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are unclear, based on dated, low-quality studies. A critical knowledge gap is long-term outcomes. Consensus on selection of critical outcomes and measures is needed to definitively evaluate treatment safety and effectiveness.ConclusionMinor methodology modifications and a focus on critical evidence can reduce review time and resources. Summarized evidence was sufficient to support guidance development and highlight important knowledge gaps.
目的
进行一项初步的系统循证综述,旨在建立罕见遗传疾病的方法学实用性,为临床建议提供支持,并确定重要的知识空白。
方法
2015 年 12 月前,通过广泛的已发表文献/灰色文献检索,寻找接受酶替代疗法或造血干细胞移植治疗的确诊为黏多糖贮积症 II 型男性患者(任何年龄、表型、基因型、家族史)的研究。采用预设的纳入标准进行摘要和全文文献选择,并采用标准化方法进行数据提取和评估证据的质量和强度。
结果
报告了 12 个结局,包括尿糖胺聚糖和肝/脾体积减少的益处,以及免疫球蛋白 G/中和抗体发展的危害(证据强度为中度)。6 分钟步行试验、身高、早期治疗的益处以及其他不良反应的危害(证据强度为低度)不太明确。其他结局的益处和危害尚不清楚(证据强度不足)。基于陈旧的低质量研究,目前对造血干细胞移植的益处和危害尚不清楚。一个关键的知识空白是长期结局。需要就关键结局和措施的选择达成共识,以明确评估治疗的安全性和有效性。
结论
对方法学进行少量修改并关注关键证据,可以减少综述的时间和资源。总结的证据足以支持指南的制定,并突出重要的知识空白。