Zeanah Charles H, Koga Sebastian F, Simion Bogdan, Stanescu Alin, Tabacaru Cristian L, Fox Nathan A, Nelson Charles A
Tulane University Health Sciences Center.
University of Virginia.
Infant Ment Health J. 2006 Nov;27(6):559-576. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20107.
The Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP) is the first ever randomized controlled trial of foster care as an alternative to institutional care for young children. It involved a collaboration between American investigators and Romanian health and child protection professionals. We present a brief description of the Romanian context and the project itself before discussing a number of ethical issues raised by the project. Organized around a discussion of exploitation, risk/benefit ratio, and cultural sensitivity, we evaluate a number of ethical issues involved in the BEIP using the Ethical Clinical Research Framework and the Fair Benefits Framework. Based on this review, we conclude that notwithstanding challenging ethical dilemmas, the benefits of the project outweighed its risks. Throughout the planning and implementation of the project, ethical issues were a central focus of discussion among the investigators and in the collaboration between Americans and Romanians. Thoughtful discussions from multiple perspectives are necessary to conduct research that is ethically sound and scientifically meaningful.
布加勒斯特早期干预项目(BEIP)是有史以来第一项针对幼儿的寄养照料作为机构照料替代方案的随机对照试验。该项目涉及美国研究人员与罗马尼亚卫生及儿童保护专业人员的合作。在讨论该项目引发的一些伦理问题之前,我们先简要介绍一下罗马尼亚的背景情况以及项目本身。围绕剥削、风险/收益比和文化敏感性展开讨论,我们使用伦理临床研究框架和公平受益框架评估了BEIP中涉及的一些伦理问题。基于这一审查,我们得出结论,尽管存在具有挑战性的伦理困境,但该项目的益处大于风险。在项目的整个规划和实施过程中,伦理问题一直是研究人员之间以及美罗合作中讨论的核心焦点。从多个角度进行深入思考的讨论对于开展符合伦理规范且具有科学意义的研究是必要的。