Department of Endocrinology, Taian City Central Hospital, 29 longtan road, Tai'an, 271000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Taishan Vocational College of Nursing, Tai'an, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
J Bone Miner Metab. 2018 Jul;36(4):439-446. doi: 10.1007/s00774-017-0849-0. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
The relationship between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and bone fracture has been examined by some observational studies, but the results remain discordant. Therefore, we aimed to assess the link between them by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE databases until the end of December 2016. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between AAC and fracture risk were estimated with fixed- or random- effects models. Seven prospective studies were included in the final analysis. The summarized RRs of any type of fractures for the highest compared with the lowest category of AAC were 1.64 (95% CI 1.30-2.07, P = 0.000) with mild heterogeneity (I = 30.1%, P = 0.188). Subgroup analysis showed that the association between AAC and fracture was not significantly modified by gender and follow-up length. Risks were similar when analyses were restricted to the studies with adjustment for bone mineral density (BMD) (RR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.31-2.38, P = 0.000, I = 49.1%). For the specific type of fracture, severe AAC was significantly related with hip fracture (RR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.22-2.20, P = 0.001, n = 5), but not with vertebral (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.58, P = 0.213, n = 3) or non-vertebral fracture (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.96-1.88, P = 0.081, n = 3). There was no evidence of publication bias. Our findings demonstrated that AAC was significantly and independently associated with a higher fracture risk, especially for hip fracture.
一些观察性研究探讨了腹主动脉钙化(AAC)与骨折之间的关系,但结果仍不一致。因此,我们旨在通过对前瞻性研究进行荟萃分析来评估它们之间的联系。通过搜索 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库,我们确定了截至 2016 年 12 月底的相关研究。使用固定或随机效应模型估算 AAC 与骨折风险之间关联的汇总相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。最终分析纳入了 7 项前瞻性研究。与 AAC 最低分类相比,最高分类的任何类型骨折的汇总 RR 为 1.64(95%CI 1.30-2.07,P=0.000),存在轻度异质性(I=30.1%,P=0.188)。亚组分析表明,AAC 与骨折之间的关联不受性别和随访时间的显著影响。当分析仅限于校正骨密度(BMD)的研究时,风险相似(RR=1.76,95%CI 1.31-2.38,P=0.000,I=49.1%)。对于特定类型的骨折,严重 AAC 与髋部骨折显著相关(RR=1.64,95%CI 1.22-2.20,P=0.001,n=5),但与椎体(RR=1.45,95%CI 0.81-2.58,P=0.213,n=3)或非椎体骨折(RR=1.35,95%CI 0.96-1.88,P=0.081,n=3)无关。没有证据表明存在发表偏倚。我们的研究结果表明,AAC 与较高的骨折风险显著相关,尤其是髋部骨折。