• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大豆蚜生物型2侵染后,具有抗蚜基因不同等位基因的大豆近等基因系中的转录组动态变化

Transcriptomic dynamics in soybean near-isogenic lines differing in alleles for an aphid resistance gene, following infestation by soybean aphid biotype 2.

作者信息

Lee Sungwoo, Cassone Bryan J, Wijeratne Asela, Jun Tae-Hwan, Michel Andrew P, Mian M A Rouf

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.

Present Address: Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34341, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Genomics. 2017 Jun 23;18(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3829-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12864-017-3829-9
PMID:28645245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5481885/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genetic resistance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] against Aphis glycines provides effective management of this invasive pest, though the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. This study aimed to investigate genome-wide changes in gene expressions of soybean near-isogenic lines (NILs) either with the Rag5 allele for resistance or the rag5 allele for susceptibility to the aphid following infestation with soybean aphid biotype 2.

RESULTS

The resistant (R)-NIL responded more rapidly to aphid infestation than the susceptible (S)-NIL, with differential expressions of 2496 genes during first 12 h of infestation (hai), compared to the aphid-free control. Although the majority of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the R-NIL also responded to aphid infestation in S-NIL, overall the response time was longer and/or the magnitude of change was smaller in the S-NIL. In addition, 915 DEGs in R-NIL continued to be regulated at all time points (0, 6, 12, and 48 hai), while only 20 DEGs did so in S-NIL. Enriched gene ontology of the 2496 DEGs involved in plant defense responses including primary metabolite catalysis, oxidative stress reduction, and phytohormone-related signaling. By comparing R- vs. S-NIL, a total of 556 DEGs were identified. Of the 13 genes annotated in a 120-kb window of the Rag5 locus, two genes (Glyma.13 g190200 and Glyma.13 g190600) were differentially expressed (upregulated in S- or R-NIL), and another gene (Glyma.13 g190500) was induced up to 4-fold in the R-NIL at 6 and 12 h following aphid infestation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study strengthens our understanding of the defense dynamics in compatible and incompatible interactions of soybean and soybean aphid biotype 2. Several DEGs (e.g., Glyma.13 g190200, Glyma.13 g190500, and Glyma.13 g190600) near the Rag5 locus are strong candidate genes for further investigations.

摘要

背景

大豆[Glycine max (L.) Merr]对大豆蚜的遗传抗性为有效治理这种入侵害虫提供了途径,但其潜在分子机制仍 largely 未知。本研究旨在调查大豆近等基因系(NILs)在受到大豆蚜生物型 2 侵染后,携带抗蚜 Rag5 等位基因或感蚜 rag5 等位基因的基因表达在全基因组范围内的变化。

结果

与未受蚜虫侵染的对照相比,抗性(R)-NIL 对蚜虫侵染的反应比感病(S)-NIL 更快,在侵染后的前 12 小时(hai)内有 2496 个基因差异表达。虽然 R-NIL 中大多数差异表达基因(DEGs)在 S-NIL 中也对蚜虫侵染有反应,但总体而言,S-NIL 的反应时间更长和/或变化幅度更小。此外,R-NIL 中的 915 个 DEGs 在所有时间点(0、6、12 和 48 hai)均持续受到调控,而 S-NIL 中只有 20 个 DEGs 如此。参与植物防御反应的 2496 个 DEGs 的基因本体富集包括初级代谢物催化、氧化应激降低和植物激素相关信号传导。通过比较 R-NIL 和 S-NIL,共鉴定出 556 个 DEGs。在 Rag5 基因座的 120-kb 窗口中注释的 13 个基因中,有两个基因(Glyma.13 g190200 和 Glyma.13 g190600)差异表达(在 S-NIL 或 R-NIL 中上调),另一个基因(Glyma.13 g190500)在蚜虫侵染后的 6 小时和 12 小时在 R-NIL 中被诱导上调至 4 倍。

结论

本研究加深了我们对大豆与大豆蚜生物型 2 亲和与非亲和互作中防御动态的理解。Rag5 基因座附近的几个 DEGs(例如,Glyma.13 g190200、Glyma.13 g190500 和 Glyma.13 g190600)是进一步研究的有力候选基因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/c8aa4feb76d7/12864_2017_3829_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/d68605aae642/12864_2017_3829_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/17faede5af9a/12864_2017_3829_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/c8aa4feb76d7/12864_2017_3829_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/d68605aae642/12864_2017_3829_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/17faede5af9a/12864_2017_3829_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df3e/5481885/c8aa4feb76d7/12864_2017_3829_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcriptomic dynamics in soybean near-isogenic lines differing in alleles for an aphid resistance gene, following infestation by soybean aphid biotype 2.大豆蚜生物型2侵染后,具有抗蚜基因不同等位基因的大豆近等基因系中的转录组动态变化
BMC Genomics. 2017 Jun 23;18(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3829-9.
2
Identification of Soybean Proteins and Genes Differentially Regulated in Near Isogenic Lines Differing in Resistance to Aphid Infestation.鉴定在抗蚜虫侵害能力不同的近等基因系中差异调控的大豆蛋白质和基因。
J Proteome Res. 2015 Oct 2;14(10):4137-46. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Dynamic transcriptomes of resistant and susceptible peach lines after infestation by green peach aphids (Myzus persicae Sülzer) reveal defence responses controlled by the Rm3 locus.受绿桃蚜(Myzus persicae Sülzer)侵害后抗性和敏感桃品系的动态转录组揭示了由 Rm3 基因座控制的防御反应。
BMC Genomics. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5215-7.
4
Multiple phytohormone signals control the transcriptional response to soybean aphid infestation in susceptible and resistant soybean plants.多种植物激素信号控制感病和抗病大豆植株对大豆蚜虫侵害的转录反应。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013 Jan;26(1):116-29. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-12-0124-FI.
5
Factors contributing to the poor performance of a soybean aphid parasitoid Binodoxys communis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on an herbivore resistant soybean cultivar.导致大豆蚜寄生蜂豆柄瘤蚜茧蜂(膜翅目:茧蜂科)在抗草食动物大豆品种上表现不佳的因素。
Environ Entomol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1417-25. doi: 10.1603/EN12188.
6
Detached leaf and whole plant assays for soybean aphid resistance: differential responses among resistance sources and biotypes.离体叶片和整株植物测定大豆蚜抗性:不同抗性资源和生物型的差异反应。
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Jun;103(3):949-57. doi: 10.1603/ec09337.
7
Genetic mapping revealed two loci for soybean aphid resistance in PI 567301B.遗传图谱定位发现大豆蚜抗性的两个位点在 PI 567301B 中。
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Jan;124(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1682-9. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
8
Feeding Behavior of Soybean Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Biotype 2 on Resistant and Susceptible Soybean.大豆蚜生物型2在抗性和感病大豆上的取食行为(半翅目:蚜科)
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Feb;109(1):426-33. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov315.
9
Field and laboratory evaluations of soybean lines against soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae).田间和实验室评估大豆品系对大豆蚜虫(半翅目:蚜科)的抗性。
J Econ Entomol. 2012 Apr;105(2):608-15. doi: 10.1603/ec11339.
10
Reduced Fitness of Virulent Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Biotypes May Influence the Longevity of Resistance Genes in Soybean.毒性大豆蚜(半翅目:蚜科)生物型适应性的降低可能影响大豆中抗性基因的持久性。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 15;10(9):e0138252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138252. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcriptomic analysis reveals candidate molecular pathways involved in pea (Pisum sativum L.) resistance to pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) biotypes.转录组分析揭示了参与豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)对豌豆蚜(Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris)生物型抗性的候选分子途径。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jul 1;26(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11742-3.
2
Molecular Interactions Between Plants and Aphids: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.植物与蚜虫之间的分子相互作用:最新进展与未来展望
Insects. 2024 Nov 28;15(12):935. doi: 10.3390/insects15120935.
3
Heat Stress and Plant-Biotic Interactions: Advances and Perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic Maize Responses to Aphid Feeding Are Revealed by a Time Series of Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Assays.转录组学和代谢组学分析的时间序列揭示了玉米对蚜虫取食的动态响应。
Plant Physiol. 2015 Nov;169(3):1727-43. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01039. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
2
Identification of Soybean Proteins and Genes Differentially Regulated in Near Isogenic Lines Differing in Resistance to Aphid Infestation.鉴定在抗蚜虫侵害能力不同的近等基因系中差异调控的大豆蛋白质和基因。
J Proteome Res. 2015 Oct 2;14(10):4137-46. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Plant immunity in plant-aphid interactions.
热应激与植物-生物相互作用:进展与展望
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;13(15):2022. doi: 10.3390/plants13152022.
4
Evaluation of aphid resistance on different rose cultivars and transcriptome analysis in response to aphid infestation.评价不同玫瑰品种对蚜虫的抗性及抗蚜过程中的转录组分析。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Mar 4;25(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10100-z.
5
Transcriptome analysis of aphid-resistant and susceptible near isogenic lines reveals candidate resistance genes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata).抗蚜和易感近等基因系转录组分析揭示豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)中的候选抗性基因。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-04021-w.
6
Fine Mapping and Characterization of an Aphid-Resistance Gene in the Soybean Landrace Fangzheng Moshidou.大豆地方品种方正墨石豆中一个抗蚜基因的精细定位与特性分析
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 15;13:899212. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.899212. eCollection 2022.
7
Identification of Candidate Genes for a Major Quantitative Disease Resistance Locus From Soybean PI 427105B for Resistance to .从大豆PI 427105B中鉴定对……具有抗性的主要数量抗病基因座的候选基因
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jun 14;13:893652. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.893652. eCollection 2022.
8
Interaction between Rag genes results in a unique synergistic transcriptional response that enhances soybean resistance to soybean aphids.Rag 基因之间的相互作用产生了一种独特的协同转录反应,增强了大豆对大豆蚜虫的抗性。
BMC Genomics. 2021 Dec 11;22(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08147-3.
9
The Source of -Mediated Resistance to Soybean Aphids Is Located in the Stem.介导大豆对蚜虫抗性的来源位于茎部。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 16;12:689986. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.689986. eCollection 2021.
10
Differential Defense Responses of Upland and Lowland Switchgrass Cultivars to a Cereal Aphid Pest.高低海拔柳枝稷品种对一种谷类蚜虫虫害的防御反应差异。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 27;21(21):7966. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217966.
植物与蚜虫相互作用中的植物免疫
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Dec 1;5:663. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00663. eCollection 2014.
4
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.使用DESeq2对RNA测序数据的倍数变化和离散度进行适度估计。
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.
5
HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.HTSeq——一个用于处理高通量测序数据的Python框架。
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
6
How phloem-feeding insects face the challenge of phloem-located defenses.韧皮部取食昆虫如何应对韧皮部防御带来的挑战。
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Aug 29;4:336. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00336.
7
Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of a compatible tomato-aphid interaction reveals a predominant salicylic acid-dependent plant response.转录组和蛋白质组分析相容的番茄-蚜虫互作揭示了主要依赖于水杨酸的植物反应。
BMC Genomics. 2013 Jul 29;14:515. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-515.
8
TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions.TopHat2:在存在插入、缺失和基因融合的情况下对转录组进行精确比对。
Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36.
9
Multiple phytohormone signals control the transcriptional response to soybean aphid infestation in susceptible and resistant soybean plants.多种植物激素信号控制感病和抗病大豆植株对大豆蚜虫侵害的转录反应。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2013 Jan;26(1):116-29. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-12-0124-FI.
10
Genetic mapping revealed two loci for soybean aphid resistance in PI 567301B.遗传图谱定位发现大豆蚜抗性的两个位点在 PI 567301B 中。
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Jan;124(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1682-9. Epub 2011 Sep 13.