Stephens Robert J, Ablordeppey Enyo, Drewry Anne M, Palmer Christopher, Wessman Brian T, Mohr Nicholas M, Roberts Brian W, Liang Stephen Y, Kollef Marin H, Fuller Brian M
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Washington School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Analgesia and sedation are cornerstone therapies for mechanically ventilated patients. Despite data showing that early deep sedation in the ICU influences outcome, this has not been investigated in the ED. Therefore, ED-based sedation practices, and their influence on outcome, remain incompletely defined. This study's objectives were to describe ED sedation practices in mechanically ventilated patients and to test the hypothesis that ED sedation depth is associated with worse outcomes.
This was a cohort study of a prospectively compiled ED registry of adult mechanically ventilated patients at a single academic medical center. Hospital mortality was the primary outcome and hospital-, ICU-, and ventilator-free days were secondary outcomes. A backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression model evaluated the primary outcome as a function of ED sedation depth. Sedation depth was assessed with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).
Four hundred fourteen patients were studied. In the ED, 354 patients (85.5%) received fentanyl, 254 (61.3%) received midazolam, and 194 (46.9%) received propofol. Deep sedation was observed in 244 patients (64.0%). After adjusting for confounders, a deeper ED RASS was associated with mortality (adjusted OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94).
Early deep sedation is common in mechanically ventilated ED patients and is associated with worse mortality. These data suggest that ED-based sedation is a modifiable variable that could be targeted to improve outcome.
镇痛和镇静是机械通气患者的基础治疗方法。尽管有数据表明重症监护病房(ICU)中的早期深度镇静会影响预后,但在急诊科(ED)尚未对此进行研究。因此,基于急诊科的镇静实践及其对预后的影响仍未完全明确。本研究的目的是描述机械通气患者在急诊科的镇静实践,并检验急诊科镇静深度与较差预后相关的假设。
这是一项对单一学术医疗中心前瞻性汇编的成年机械通气患者急诊科登记册进行的队列研究。医院死亡率是主要结局,无医院、无ICU和无呼吸机天数是次要结局。采用向后逐步多变量逻辑回归模型评估主要结局作为急诊科镇静深度的函数。镇静深度采用里士满躁动-镇静量表(RASS)进行评估。
共研究了414例患者。在急诊科,354例患者(85.5%)接受了芬太尼,254例(61.3%)接受了咪达唑仑,194例(46.9%)接受了丙泊酚。244例患者(64.0%)出现深度镇静。在对混杂因素进行调整后,急诊科RASS评分越深与死亡率相关(调整后的比值比,0.77;95%置信区间,0.63 - 0.94)。
早期深度镇静在急诊科机械通气患者中很常见,且与较差的死亡率相关。这些数据表明,基于急诊科的镇静是一个可改变的变量,可作为改善预后的目标。