• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高急诊科插管后镇痛率和及时率的质量改进措施。

Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Rate of and Time to Post-intubation Analgesia in the Emergency Department.

机构信息

The University of Kansas Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

The University of California San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 14;22(4):827-833. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.51115.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2021.4.51115
PMID:35354020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328183/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intubation and mechanical ventilation are common interventions performed in the emergency department (ED). These interventions cause pain and discomfort to patients and necessitate analgesia and sedation. Recent trends in the ED and intensive care unit focus on an analgesia-first model to improve patient outcomes. Initial data from our institution demonstrated an over-emphasis on sedation and an opportunity to improve analgesic administration. As a result of these findings, the ED undertook a quality improvement (QI) project aimed at improving analgesia administration and time to analgesia post-intubation.

METHODS

We performed a pre-post study between January 2017-February 2019 in the ED. Patients over the age of 18 who were intubated using rapid sequence intubation (RSI) were included in the study. The primary outcome was the rate of analgesia administration; a secondary outcome was time to analgesia administration. Quality improvement interventions occurred in two phases: an initial intervention focused on nursing education only, and a subsequent intervention that included nursing and physician education.

RESULTS

During the study period, 460 patients were intubated in the ED and met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Prior to the first intervention, the average rate of analgesia administration was 57.3%; after the second intervention, the rate was 94.9% (P <0.01). Prior to the first intervention, average time to analgesia administration was 36.0 minutes; after the second intervention, the time was 16.6 minutes (P value <0.01).

CONCLUSION

This QI intervention demonstrates the ability of education interventions alone to increase the rate of analgesia administration and reduce the time to analgesia in post-intubation patients.

摘要

简介

插管和机械通气是急诊科(ED)中常见的干预措施。这些干预措施会给患者带来疼痛和不适,需要进行镇痛和镇静。ED 和重症监护病房(ICU)的最新趋势侧重于采用镇痛优先的模式来改善患者的预后。我院的初步数据表明,镇静的重视程度过高,有机会改善镇痛药物的管理。基于这些发现,ED 开展了一项质量改进(QI)项目,旨在改善插管后患者的镇痛药物管理和镇痛起效时间。

方法

我们在 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在 ED 进行了一项前后对照研究。研究纳入了年龄大于 18 岁且使用快速序贯诱导插管(RSI)进行插管的患者。主要结局是镇痛药物管理的实施率;次要结局是镇痛起效时间。QI 干预分为两个阶段:第一阶段仅关注护理教育,第二阶段包括护理和医生教育。

结果

在研究期间,460 名患者在 ED 中插管并符合纳入/排除标准。在第一阶段干预之前,镇痛药物管理的平均实施率为 57.3%;第二阶段干预后,该比例提高至 94.9%(P<0.01)。在第一阶段干预之前,平均的镇痛起效时间为 36.0 分钟;第二阶段干预后,该时间缩短至 16.6 分钟(P 值<0.01)。

结论

这项 QI 干预表明,仅通过教育干预即可提高镇痛药物管理的实施率,并缩短插管后患者的镇痛起效时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6135/8328183/325ea6b384ae/wjem-22-827-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6135/8328183/db92ebd5cd00/wjem-22-827-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6135/8328183/325ea6b384ae/wjem-22-827-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6135/8328183/db92ebd5cd00/wjem-22-827-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6135/8328183/325ea6b384ae/wjem-22-827-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Rate of and Time to Post-intubation Analgesia in the Emergency Department.提高急诊科插管后镇痛率和及时率的质量改进措施。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 14;22(4):827-833. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.51115.
2
Improving door-to-analgesia timing in musculoskeletal injuries in an academic emergency department in India: a quality improvement project.改善印度某学术急诊部门肌肉骨骼损伤的到镇痛治疗时间:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 4;13(2):e002815. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002815.
3
Impact of Clinical Pharmacists on Initiation of Postintubation Analgesia in the Emergency Department.临床药师对急诊科气管插管后镇痛起始的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.029.
4
Analgosedative interventions after rapid sequence intubation with rocuronium in the emergency department.在急诊科使用罗库溴铵行快速序贯插管后进行的镇痛镇静干预。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1129-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED.急诊科气管插管后抗焦虑和镇痛措施不足。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 May;26(4):469-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.05.024.
6
Impact of Rocuronium and Succinylcholine on Sedation Initiation After Rapid Sequence Intubation.罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱对快速顺序诱导插管后镇静起始的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.028. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
First Pass Success Without Hypoxemia Is Increased With the Use of Apneic Oxygenation During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department.在急诊科快速顺序插管期间使用窒息氧合可提高首次通过成功率且无低氧血症。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;23(6):703-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12931. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Effectiveness of interventions to improve medication use during rapid-sequence intubation in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科快速顺序插管期间改善用药的干预措施的有效性
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Sep 1;74(17):1353-1362. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160396. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Impact of post-intubation interventions on mortality in patients boarding in the emergency department.急诊留观患者气管插管后干预措施对死亡率的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;15(6):708-11. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.7.22292.
10
Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: the Scottish district hospital perspective.急诊科的气管插管:苏格兰地区医院的视角
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):394-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.041988.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Post-Intubation Analgesia in the Emergency Department.改善急诊科气管插管后的镇痛效果
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):624. doi: 10.1177/1062860619857813. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
Analgosedative interventions after rapid sequence intubation with rocuronium in the emergency department.在急诊科使用罗库溴铵行快速序贯插管后进行的镇痛镇静干预。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1129-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
Analgosedation Practices and the Impact of Sedation Depth on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in the ED: A Cohort Study.
急诊科需要机械通气患者的镇痛镇静实践及镇静深度对临床结局的影响:一项队列研究
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
A primer on PDSA: executing plan-do-study-act cycles in practice, not just in name.PDSA入门:在实践中执行计划-执行-研究-行动循环,而不仅仅是在名义上。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):572-577. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006245. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
5
Impact of an Analgesia-Based Sedation Protocol on Mechanically Ventilated Patients in a Medical Intensive Care Unit.基于镇痛的镇静方案对医学重症监护病房机械通气患者的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):903-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001393.
6
Intensive care unit patients' experience of being conscious during endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.重症监护病房患者在气管插管和机械通气期间有意识的体验。
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Mar;22(2):81-88. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12200. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Impact of Rocuronium and Succinylcholine on Sedation Initiation After Rapid Sequence Intubation.罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱对快速顺序诱导插管后镇静起始的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.028. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Early goal-directed sedation versus standard sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pilot study*.早期目标导向镇静与机械通气危重症患者常规镇静的比较:一项初步研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1983-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a437d.
9
Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study.机械通气危重症成人镇静深度与长期死亡率:一项前瞻性纵向多中心队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):910-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2830-2. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
10
Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients.早期重症监护镇静预测机械通气危重症患者的长期死亡率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 15;186(8):724-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0522OC. Epub 2012 Aug 2.