• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镇静深度与机械通气空中医疗转运患者住院时间延长相关:一项队列研究。

Sedation Depth is Associated with Increased Hospital Length of Stay in Mechanically Ventilated Air Medical Transport Patients: A Cohort Study.

作者信息

George Brendan P, Vakkalanka J Priyanka, Harland Karisa K, Faine Brett, Rewitzer Stacey, Zepeski Anne, Fuller Brian M, Mohr Nicholas M, Ahmed Azeemuddin

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):783-792. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1705948. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1080/10903127.2019.1705948
PMID:31846589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7375898/
Abstract

: Analgesics, sedatives, and neuromuscular blockers are commonly used medications for mechanically ventilated air medical transport patients. Prior research in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) has demonstrated that depth of sedation is associated with increased mechanical ventilation duration, delirium, increased hospital length-of-stay (LOS), and decreased survival. The objectives of this study were to evaluate current sedation practices in the prehospital setting and to determine the impact on clinical outcomes. : A retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients transferred by air ambulance to a single 812-bed Midwestern academic medical center from July 2013 to May 2018 was conducted. Prehospital sedation medications and depth of sedation [Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score (RASS)] were measured. Primary outcome was hospital LOS. Secondary outcomes were delirium, length of mechanical ventilation, in-hospital mortality, and need for neurosurgical procedures. Univariate analyses were used to measure the association between sedatives, sedation depth, and clinical outcomes. Multivariable models adjusted for potentially confounding covariates to measure the impact of predictors on clinical outcomes. : Three hundred twenty-seven patients were included. Among those patients, 79.2% of patients received sedatives, with 41% of these patients achieving deep sedation (RASS = -4). Among patients receiving sedation, 58.3% received at least one dose of benzodiazepines. Moderate and deep sedation was associated with an increase in LOS of 59% (aRR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.40-1.81) and 24% (aRR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.10-1.40), respectively. Benzodiazepines were associated with a mean increase of 2.9 days in the hospital (95% CI, 0.7-5.1). No association existed between either specific medications or depth of sedation and the development of delirium. : Prehospital moderate and deep sedation, as well as benzodiazepine administration, is associated with increased hospital LOS. Our findings point toward sedation being a modifiable risk factor and suggest an important need for further research of sedation practices in the prehospital setting.

摘要

镇痛药、镇静剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂是机械通气的空中医疗转运患者常用的药物。先前在急诊科(ED)和重症监护病房(ICU)的研究表明,镇静深度与机械通气时间延长、谵妄、住院时间(LOS)延长及生存率降低有关。本研究的目的是评估院前环境下当前的镇静实践,并确定其对临床结局的影响。

对2013年7月至2018年5月通过空中救护车转运至一家拥有812张床位的中西部学术医疗中心的机械通气患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。测量了院前镇静药物和镇静深度[里士满躁动 - 镇静量表评分(RASS)]。主要结局是住院LOS。次要结局是谵妄、机械通气时间、院内死亡率以及神经外科手术需求。采用单因素分析来衡量镇静剂、镇静深度与临床结局之间的关联。多变量模型对潜在的混杂协变量进行了调整,以衡量预测因素对临床结局的影响。

纳入了327例患者。在这些患者中,79.2%的患者接受了镇静剂,其中41%的患者达到深度镇静(RASS = -4)。在接受镇静的患者中,58.3%至少接受了一剂苯二氮䓬类药物。中度和深度镇静分别与LOS增加59%(aRR:1.59;95%CI:1.40 - 1.81)和24%(aRR:1.24;95%CI:1.10 - 1.40)相关。苯二氮䓬类药物与住院时间平均增加2.9天相关(95%CI,0.7 - 5.1)。特定药物或镇静深度与谵妄的发生之间均无关联。

院前中度和深度镇静以及苯二氮䓬类药物的使用与住院LOS增加有关。我们的研究结果表明镇静是一个可改变的风险因素,并表明迫切需要进一步研究院前环境下的镇静实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b5/7375898/37cda6cce6a5/nihms-1550218-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b5/7375898/37cda6cce6a5/nihms-1550218-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b5/7375898/37cda6cce6a5/nihms-1550218-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sedation Depth is Associated with Increased Hospital Length of Stay in Mechanically Ventilated Air Medical Transport Patients: A Cohort Study.镇静深度与机械通气空中医疗转运患者住院时间延长相关:一项队列研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):783-792. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1705948. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation.改进的镇痛、镇静和谵妄方案与谵妄持续时间和机械通气时间的缩短相关。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Mar;11(3):367-74. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-210OC.
3
Correlation of Sedation Depth During Critical Care Transport and Hospitalization.重症转运期间的镇静深度与住院时间的相关性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;39(5):429-438. doi: 10.1177/08850666231210802. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
The ED-SED Study: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study of Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Emergency Department SEDation for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.ED-SED 研究:一项与急诊机械通气患者镇静相关的多中心、前瞻性队列研究,旨在调查实践模式和临床结局。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1539-1548. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003928.
5
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
6
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.
7
Analgosedation Practices and the Impact of Sedation Depth on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in the ED: A Cohort Study.急诊科需要机械通气患者的镇痛镇静实践及镇静深度对临床结局的影响:一项队列研究
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients.早期重症监护镇静预测机械通气危重症患者的长期死亡率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 15;186(8):724-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0522OC. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
9
Sedation practices and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in a prospective multicenter cohort.机械通气患者镇静实践与临床结局的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Apr 17;23(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2394-9.
10
A dual-center cohort study on the association between early deep sedation and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: The COVID-SED study.一项关于 COVID-19 大流行期间机械通气患者早期深度镇静与临床结局之间关联的中心队列研究:COVID-SED 研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 15;26(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04042-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice-Pattern Variation in Sedation of Neurotrauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: An International Survey.神经创伤患者在重症监护病房镇静的实践模式差异:一项国际调查。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Dec;38(12):1143-1150. doi: 10.1177/08850666231186563. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
A retrospective review of post-intubation sedation and analgesia practices in a South African private ambulance service.对南非一家私人救护车服务机构插管后镇静和镇痛实践的回顾性研究。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;12(4):467-472. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
The AIR-SED Study: A Multicenter Cohort Study of SEDation Practices, Deep Sedation, and Coma Among Mechanically Ventilated AIR Transport Patients.空中医疗转运患者镇静实践、深度镇静及昏迷的多中心队列研究:AIR-SED研究
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Dec 9;3(12):e0597. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000597. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Variability in sedation assessment among intubated patients in the emergency department.急诊科插管患者镇静评估的变异性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;28(10):1173-1176. doi: 10.1111/acem.14259. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
5
Mortality Predictors and Associated Factors in Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study.重症监护病房患者的死亡率预测因素及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2020 Aug 1;2020:1483827. doi: 10.1155/2020/1483827. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The ED-SED Study: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study of Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Emergency Department SEDation for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.ED-SED 研究:一项与急诊机械通气患者镇静相关的多中心、前瞻性队列研究,旨在调查实践模式和临床结局。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1539-1548. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003928.
2
Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients.重症患者的右美托咪定早期镇静。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2506-2517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904710. Epub 2019 May 19.
3
Practice Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Early Sedation Depth in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机械通气患者早期镇静深度相关的实践模式和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):471-479. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002885.
4
Analgosedation Practices and the Impact of Sedation Depth on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in the ED: A Cohort Study.急诊科需要机械通气患者的镇痛镇静实践及镇静深度对临床结局的影响:一项队列研究
Chest. 2017 Nov;152(5):963-971. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.041. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
ICU sedation with dexmedetomidine after severe traumatic brain injury.严重创伤性脑损伤后使用右美托咪定进行重症监护病房镇静
Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1266-70. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1187289. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Clinical effectiveness of a sedation protocol minimizing benzodiazepine infusions and favoring early dexmedetomidine: a before-after study.
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 2;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0874-0.
7
Prehospital tidal volume influences hospital tidal volume: A cohort study.院前潮气量对院内潮气量的影响:一项队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2015 Jun;30(3):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Benzodiazepine use in the United States.苯二氮䓬类药物在美国的使用情况。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;72(2):136-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1763.
9
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑或丙泊酚用于机械通气时间延长患者的镇静:两项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.
10
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于重症患者镇静的随机试验
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.