Granier F, Girard M, Schmitt L, Boscredon J, Oules J, Escande M
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1985;320:67-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb08078.x.
Mianserin and nomifensine were compared in 61 depressive patients in a randomized double-blind multicentre study. During the first week the antidepressant dosages were low, mianserin 30 mg and nomifensine 50 mg. After the first week dosages were doubled to 60 mg and 100 mg respectively. At baseline there were no significant differences between treatment groups for sex, age, class of depression, previous treatment, somatic symptoms, previous vital events, global clinical appreciation, global sleep appreciation, and depression assessed on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS). Assessments were made at 7, 14 and 28 days. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for HDRS, MADRS or HARS, either globally or when divided into endogenous and reactive subgroups. Compared with nomifensine there were significantly greater scores with mianserin for global clinical appreciation and global sleep appreciation. There were more withdrawals and dosage changes with nomifensine than with mianserin. Regarding concomitant treatment, significantly less anxiolytics were prescribed to the mianserin group. This study confirms that mianserin is an effective and sedative antidepressant whereas nomifensine is an effective and stimulating antidepressant.
在一项随机双盲多中心研究中,对61名抑郁症患者比较了米安色林和诺米芬辛的疗效。在第一周,抗抑郁药剂量较低,米安色林为30毫克,诺米芬辛为50毫克。第一周后,剂量分别加倍至60毫克和100毫克。在基线时,治疗组在性别、年龄、抑郁类型、既往治疗、躯体症状、既往重大事件、整体临床评估、整体睡眠评估以及根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)或汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HARS)评估的抑郁程度方面均无显著差异。在第7天、14天和28天进行评估。治疗组在HDRS、MADRS或HARS方面,无论是整体还是分为内源性和反应性亚组时,均无显著差异。与诺米芬辛相比,米安色林在整体临床评估和整体睡眠评估方面的得分显著更高。诺米芬辛的停药和剂量变化比米安色林更多。关于联合治疗,米安色林组开具的抗焦虑药明显更少。这项研究证实,米安色林是一种有效且有镇静作用的抗抑郁药,而诺米芬辛是一种有效且有兴奋作用的抗抑郁药。