Suppr超能文献

一项比较米安色林与丙咪嗪的双盲多中心试验。

A double-blind multicentre trial comparing mianserin with imipramine.

作者信息

Pichot P, Dreyfus J F, Pull C

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):87S-90S.

Abstract
  1. Fifty-four depressive in-patients aged 18-45 yr, were treated at random, in double-blind conditions, with mianserin 60 mg daily or imipramine 150 mg daily in three divided doses for 4 weeks. Nitrazepam and diazepam were also allowed if necessary. 2. There was no significant difference in antidepressant efficacy between the two groups, as assessed by the rating scales of Hamilton, Beck and Overall, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and a global clinical rating. 3. The overall frequency of side-effects was significantly lower with mianserin than with imipramine. Autonomic symptoms increased in severity during treatment with imipramine, but not with mianserin. 4. the patients treated with imipramine had a fall in blood pressure which was not observed during mianserin treatment.
摘要
  1. 54名年龄在18至45岁之间的抑郁症住院患者,在双盲条件下被随机分配,分别接受每日60毫克米安色林治疗,或每日150毫克丙咪嗪分三次服用,疗程为4周。必要时也可使用硝西泮和地西泮。2. 根据汉密尔顿、贝克和奥弗尔评定量表、简明精神病评定量表以及整体临床评定,两组之间的抗抑郁疗效无显著差异。3. 米安色林的副作用总体发生率明显低于丙咪嗪。使用丙咪嗪治疗期间自主神经症状的严重程度增加,但使用米安色林时未出现这种情况。4. 接受丙咪嗪治疗的患者血压下降,而米安色林治疗期间未观察到这种情况。

相似文献

5
A double-blind group comparative trial of mianserin and diazepam in depressed outpatients.
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1980 Mar;13(2):79-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019617.

本文引用的文献

1
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
2
An inventory for measuring depression.一份用于测量抑郁的量表。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验