Suppr超能文献

使用佩利-罗布森视力表时,对比度阈值下字母清晰度的差异。

Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.

作者信息

Elliott D B, Whitaker D, Bonette L

机构信息

Clinical Vision Research Unit, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990 Oct;10(4):323-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1990.tb00877.x.

Abstract

One disadvantage of using high-contrast letters as test objects when measuring visual acuity is the fact that they are not of equal legibility. A number of charts are now commercially available that assess contrast sensitivity using letter targets. This study attempted to assess the legibility of letters at contrast threshold on the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart by determining the percentage of correct responses for each of the ten Sloan letters at contrast threshold. Results of 493 contrast sensitivity measurements taken in optometric practice indicated that there is a definite difference in legibility between letters at contrast threshold as for letters at acuity threshold. The data suggest that the probability of correctly identifying two out of a group of three letters at threshold on the Pelli-Robson chart varies between 67% and 97% due to letter type alone. Because of the very regular and pronounced miscalling of the letter C as an O, we suggest that this should be accepted as a correct call during threshold measurements on the Pelli-Robson chart. This helps to balance the legibility of different groups of letters.

摘要

在测量视力时使用高对比度字母作为测试对象的一个缺点是,它们的易读性并不相同。现在市面上有许多使用字母目标来评估对比敏感度的视力表。本研究试图通过确定佩利-罗布森字母对比敏感度视力表上对比度阈值下十个斯隆字母中每个字母的正确反应百分比,来评估对比度阈值下字母的易读性。在验光实践中进行的493次对比敏感度测量结果表明,对比度阈值下字母的易读性与视力阈值下字母的易读性存在明显差异。数据表明,仅由于字母类型的原因,在佩利-罗布森视力表上阈值时从一组三个字母中正确识别出两个字母的概率在67%至97%之间变化。由于字母C经常被误称为O,我们建议在佩利-罗布森视力表的阈值测量期间应将此视为正确的称呼。这有助于平衡不同字母组的易读性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验