Elliott D B, Whitaker D, Bonette L
Clinical Vision Research Unit, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1990 Oct;10(4):323-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1990.tb00877.x.
One disadvantage of using high-contrast letters as test objects when measuring visual acuity is the fact that they are not of equal legibility. A number of charts are now commercially available that assess contrast sensitivity using letter targets. This study attempted to assess the legibility of letters at contrast threshold on the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart by determining the percentage of correct responses for each of the ten Sloan letters at contrast threshold. Results of 493 contrast sensitivity measurements taken in optometric practice indicated that there is a definite difference in legibility between letters at contrast threshold as for letters at acuity threshold. The data suggest that the probability of correctly identifying two out of a group of three letters at threshold on the Pelli-Robson chart varies between 67% and 97% due to letter type alone. Because of the very regular and pronounced miscalling of the letter C as an O, we suggest that this should be accepted as a correct call during threshold measurements on the Pelli-Robson chart. This helps to balance the legibility of different groups of letters.
在测量视力时使用高对比度字母作为测试对象的一个缺点是,它们的易读性并不相同。现在市面上有许多使用字母目标来评估对比敏感度的视力表。本研究试图通过确定佩利-罗布森字母对比敏感度视力表上对比度阈值下十个斯隆字母中每个字母的正确反应百分比,来评估对比度阈值下字母的易读性。在验光实践中进行的493次对比敏感度测量结果表明,对比度阈值下字母的易读性与视力阈值下字母的易读性存在明显差异。数据表明,仅由于字母类型的原因,在佩利-罗布森视力表上阈值时从一组三个字母中正确识别出两个字母的概率在67%至97%之间变化。由于字母C经常被误称为O,我们建议在佩利-罗布森视力表的阈值测量期间应将此视为正确的称呼。这有助于平衡不同字母组的易读性。