Menopause. 2017 Jul;24(7):728-753. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000921.
The 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) updates the 2012 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society and identifies future research needs. An Advisory Panel of clinicians and researchers expert in the field of women's health and menopause was recruited by NAMS to review the 2012 Position Statement, evaluate new literature, assess the evidence, and reach consensus on recommendations, using the level of evidence to identify the strength of recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The Panel's recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees.Hormone therapy (HT) remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and has been shown to prevent bone loss and fracture. The risks of HT differ depending on type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. Treatment should be individualized to identify the most appropriate HT type, dose, formulation, route of administration, and duration of use, using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of the benefits and risks of continuing or discontinuing HT.For women aged younger than 60 years or who are within 10 years of menopause onset and have no contraindications, the benefit-risk ratio is most favorable for treatment of bothersome VMS and for those at elevated risk for bone loss or fracture. For women who initiate HT more than 10 or 20 years from menopause onset or are aged 60 years or older, the benefit-risk ratio appears less favorable because of the greater absolute risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and dementia. Longer durations of therapy should be for documented indications such as persistent VMS or bone loss, with shared decision making and periodic reevaluation. For bothersome GSM symptoms not relieved with over-the-counter therapies and without indications for use of systemic HT, low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy or other therapies are recommended.This NAMS position statement has been endorsed by Academy of Women's Health, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Association of Nurse Practitioners, American Medical Women's Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Asociación Mexicana para el Estudio del Climaterio, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, Australasian Menopause Society, Chinese Menopause Society, Colegio Mexicano de Especialistas en Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Czech Menopause and Andropause Society, Dominican Menopause Society, European Menopause and Andropause Society, German Menopause Society, Groupe d'études de la ménopause et du vieillissement Hormonal, HealthyWomen, Indian Menopause Society, International Menopause Society, International Osteoporosis Foundation, International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, Israeli Menopause Society, Japan Society of Menopause and Women's Health, Korean Society of Menopause, Menopause Research Society of Singapore, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health, SOBRAC and FEBRASGO, SIGMA Canadian Menopause Society, Società Italiana della Menopausa, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, South African Menopause Society, Taiwanese Menopause Society, and the Thai Menopause Society. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports the value of this clinical document as an educational tool, June 2017. The British Menopause Society supports this Position Statement.
北美更年期协会(NAMS)2017年激素治疗立场声明更新了2012年北美更年期协会激素治疗立场声明,并确定了未来的研究需求。北美更年期协会招募了一个由女性健康和更年期领域的临床医生和研究人员组成的咨询小组,以审查2012年立场声明、评估新文献、评估证据,并就建议达成共识,使用证据水平来确定建议的强度和证据的质量。该小组的建议经北美更年期协会董事会审查并批准。
激素治疗(HT)仍然是血管舒缩症状(VMS)和更年期泌尿生殖综合征(GSM)最有效的治疗方法,并且已被证明可预防骨质流失和骨折。激素治疗的风险因类型、剂量、使用持续时间、给药途径、开始时间以及是否使用孕激素而有所不同。治疗应个体化,以确定最合适的激素治疗类型、剂量、剂型、给药途径和使用持续时间,利用现有最佳证据使益处最大化并使风险最小化,并定期重新评估继续或停止激素治疗的益处和风险。
对于年龄小于60岁或绝经开始10年内且无禁忌证的女性,治疗令人烦恼的血管舒缩症状以及骨质流失或骨折风险较高的女性,其获益风险比最为有利。对于绝经开始10年或20年以上开始激素治疗的女性或年龄在60岁及以上的女性,由于冠心病、中风、静脉血栓栓塞和痴呆的绝对风险更高,其获益风险比似乎不太有利。更长疗程的治疗应针对如持续性血管舒缩症状或骨质流失等有记录的适应证,进行共同决策并定期重新评估。对于非处方治疗无法缓解且无全身激素治疗适应证的令人烦恼的更年期泌尿生殖综合征症状,建议采用低剂量阴道雌激素治疗或其他治疗方法。
妇女健康学会、美国临床内分泌学家协会、美国执业护士协会、美国女医师协会、美国生殖医学学会、墨西哥更年期研究协会、生殖健康专业人员协会、澳大利亚更年期协会、中国更年期学会、墨西哥妇产科专家学院、捷克更年期与男性更年期协会、多米尼加更年期协会、欧洲更年期与男性更年期协会、德国更年期协会、激素更年期与衰老研究小组、健康女性组织、印度更年期协会、国际更年期协会、国际骨质疏松基金会、国际女性性健康研究学会、以色列更年期协会、日本更年期与女性健康学会、韩国更年期学会、新加坡更年期研究学会、全国女性健康执业护士协会、SOBRAC和FEBRASGO、加拿大更年期协会西格玛分会、意大利更年期协会、加拿大妇产科学会、南非更年期协会、台湾更年期学会和泰国更年期学会。美国妇产科医师学会支持将这份临床文件作为一种教育工具,2017年6月。英国更年期协会支持本立场声明。