Menopause. 2018 Nov;25(11):1362-1387. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001241.
The 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) updates the 2012 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society and identifies future research needs. An Advisory Panel of clinicians and researchers expert in the field of women's health and menopause was recruited by NAMS to review the 2012 Position Statement, evaluate new literature, assess the evidence, and reach consensus on recommendations, using the level of evidence to identify the strength of recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The Panel's recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees.Hormone therapy (HT) remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and has been shown to prevent bone loss and fracture. The risks of HT differ depending on type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. Treatment should be individualized to identify the most appropriate HT type, dose, formulation, route of administration, and duration of use, using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of the benefits and risks of continuing or discontinuing HT.For women aged younger than 60 years or who are within 10 years of menopause onset and have no contraindications, the benefit-risk ratio is most favorable for treatment of bothersome VMS and for those at elevated risk for bone loss or fracture. For women who initiate HT more than 10 or 20 years from menopause onset or are aged 60 years or older, the benefit-risk ratio appears less favorable because of the greater absolute risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and dementia. Longer durations of therapy should be for documented indications such as persistent VMS or bone loss, with shared decision making and periodic reevaluation. For bothersome GSM symptoms not relieved with over-the-counter therapies and without indications for use of systemic HT, low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy or other therapies are recommended.This NAMS position statement has been endorsed by Academy of Women's Health, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Association of Nurse Practitioners, American Medical Women's Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Asociación Mexicana para el Estudio del Climaterio, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, Australasian Menopause Society, Chinese Menopause Society, Colegio Mexicano de Especialistas en Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Czech Menopause and Andropause Society, Dominican Menopause Society, European Menopause and Andropause Society, German Menopause Society, Groupe d'études de la ménopause et du vieillissement Hormonal, HealthyWomen, Indian Menopause Society, International Menopause Society, International Osteoporosis Foundation, International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, Israeli Menopause Society, Japan Society of Menopause and Women's Health, Korean Society of Menopause, Menopause Research Society of Singapore, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health, SOBRAC and FEBRASGO, SIGMA Canadian Menopause Society, Società Italiana della Menopausa, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, South African Menopause Society, Taiwanese Menopause Society, and the Thai Menopause Society. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports the value of this clinical document as an educational tool, June 2017. The British Menopause Society supports this Position Statement.
2017 年北美绝经学会(NAMS)激素治疗立场声明更新了 2012 年北美绝经学会激素治疗立场声明,并确定了未来的研究需求。NAMS 招募了一组在女性健康和绝经领域具有专业知识的临床医生和研究人员组成顾问小组,对 2012 年的立场声明进行审查,评估新的文献,评估证据,并就建议达成共识,使用证据水平确定建议的强度和证据的质量。该小组的建议由 NAMS 董事会审查和批准。
激素治疗(HT)仍然是治疗血管舒缩症状(VMS)和绝经后生殖泌尿综合征(GSM)最有效的方法,并且已被证明可以预防骨质流失和骨折。HT 的风险因类型、剂量、使用持续时间、给药途径、开始时间以及是否使用孕激素而不同。应根据最适合的 HT 类型、剂量、配方、给药途径和使用持续时间进行个体化治疗,使用最佳可用证据来最大程度地提高益处并最小化风险,并定期重新评估继续或停止 HT 的益处和风险。
对于年龄小于 60 岁或绝经后 10 年内且无禁忌症的女性,治疗烦人的 VMS 和骨质流失或骨折风险升高的女性,其获益风险比最有利。对于绝经后 10 年或 20 年以上或 60 岁以上开始 HT 的女性,由于冠心病、中风、静脉血栓栓塞和痴呆的绝对风险增加,获益风险比似乎不太有利。更长的治疗持续时间应针对明确的适应证,如持续的 VMS 或骨质流失,并进行共同决策和定期重新评估。对于未经 OTC 治疗缓解的烦人的 GSM 症状且无全身 HT 使用指征的女性,建议使用低剂量阴道雌激素治疗或其他治疗方法。
本 NAMS 立场声明得到了女性健康学会、美国临床内分泌医师学会、美国护士从业者协会、美国妇女医学协会、美国生殖医学学会、墨西哥更年期协会、生殖健康专业人员协会、澳大拉西亚更年期协会、中国更年期协会、墨西哥妇科和产科专家协会、捷克更年期和雄激素缺乏症协会、多米尼加更年期协会、欧洲更年期和雄激素缺乏症协会、德国更年期协会、更年期和激素衰老研究小组、HealthyWomen、印度更年期协会、国际更年期协会、国际骨质疏松基金会、国际妇女性健康研究学会、以色列更年期协会、日本更年期和妇女健康学会、韩国更年期协会、新加坡更年期研究学会、国家妇女健康护士从业者协会、SOBRAC 和 FEBRASGO、SIGMA 加拿大更年期协会、意大利更年期协会、加拿大妇产科医生学会、南非更年期协会、台湾更年期协会和泰国更年期协会的认可。美国妇产科医师学会支持将这份临床文件作为教育工具的价值,2017 年 6 月。英国更年期学会支持这一立场声明。