Collins Anne G E, Albrecht Matthew A, Waltz James A, Gold James M, Frank Michael J
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 31.
When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants' choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system's contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help to design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes and infer their contributions in individuals.
We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In experiments 1 and 2, we tested this protocol with healthy young adults (n = 29 and n = 52, respectively). In experiment 3, we used it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia (n = 49 patients, n = 32 control subjects).
Experiments 1 and 2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, as evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay and reward history, respectively. They also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort when controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared with control subjects.
Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, to further our understanding of psychiatric diseases.
在研究学习时,研究人员直接观察到的只有参与者的选择,而这些选择通常被认为源于单一的学习过程。然而,一些可分离的系统,如工作记忆(WM)和强化学习(RL),会同时对人类学习产生影响。确定每个系统的贡献对于描绘与行为并行起作用的神经基质至关重要;计算建模有助于设计任务,从而能够对这些过程进行可分离的识别,并推断它们在个体中的贡献。
我们提出了一种新的实验方案,该方案能够分别确定RL和WM对学习的贡献,对两者的参数变化敏感,并使我们能够研究这些过程是否相互作用。在实验1和实验2中,我们用健康的年轻人(分别为n = 29和n = 52)对该方案进行了测试。在实验3中,我们用它来研究服用药物的精神分裂症患者(n = 49例患者,n = 32例对照受试者)的学习缺陷。
实验1和实验2确定了WM和RL对学习的贡献,分别通过负荷、延迟和奖励历史对选择的参数调制得到证明。它们还显示了WM和RL之间的相互作用,即在高WM负荷下RL增强。此外,在控制强化历史时,我们观察到了心理努力的代价:参与者更喜欢在低WM负荷下遇到的刺激。实验3揭示了精神分裂症患者与对照受试者相比,WM贡献存在选择性缺陷,而RL价值学习得以保留。
计算方法使我们能够理清多个系统对学习的贡献,从而加深我们对精神疾病的理解。