• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小学阶段儿童的前瞻性思维与决策制定

Prospective thinking and decision making in primary school age children.

作者信息

Lombardi Elisabetta, Di Dio Cinzia, Castelli Ilaria, Massaro Davide, Marchetti Antonella

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Research Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2017 Jun 18;3(6):e00323. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00323. eCollection 2017 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00323
PMID:28653040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5477063/
Abstract

In this study, we seek to widen our understanding of the developmental processes underlying bargaining behaviour in children addressing the concept of prospective thinking. We argue that the emergence of the capacity to think prospectively about future outcomes or behaviours in response to current actions is a required precedent to strategic decision making. To test this idea, we compared 6, 8 and 10 years old children's performance on three tasks: the ultimatum game assessing fairness/inequality aversion, the marshmallow task, an intertemporal choice task evaluating the ability to delay gratification, and the dictator game assessing altruism. The children's socio-demographic and cognitive variables were also evaluated. We hypothesized that development of strategic thinking in the ultimatum game is related to an increased ability to delay gratification - given that both tasks require looking at prospective benefits - and, crucially, not to altruism, which benefits from immediate selfless reward. Our results confirmed our hypothesis suggesting that increased strategic planning with age would also stem from the development of competencies like prospective thinking.

摘要

在本研究中,我们试图拓宽对儿童讨价还价行为背后发展过程的理解,探讨前瞻性思维的概念。我们认为,针对当前行动对未来结果或行为进行前瞻性思考的能力的出现,是战略决策的必要前提。为了验证这一观点,我们比较了6岁、8岁和10岁儿童在三项任务中的表现:评估公平/不平等厌恶的最后通牒博弈、评估延迟满足能力的跨期选择任务棉花糖任务,以及评估利他主义的独裁者博弈。我们还评估了儿童的社会人口统计学和认知变量。我们假设,最后通牒博弈中战略思维的发展与延迟满足能力的提高有关——因为这两项任务都需要考虑预期收益——而且至关重要的是,与利他主义无关,利他主义受益于即时的无私回报。我们的结果证实了我们的假设,表明随着年龄增长,战略规划能力的提高也源于前瞻性思维等能力的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/49269d6456d8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/b886e99852e4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/662ce169b917/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/49269d6456d8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/b886e99852e4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/662ce169b917/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6c8/5477063/49269d6456d8/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective thinking and decision making in primary school age children.小学阶段儿童的前瞻性思维与决策制定
Heliyon. 2017 Jun 18;3(6):e00323. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00323. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
The effect of episodic future thinking on young children's future-oriented decision making.情景式未来思维对幼儿面向未来决策的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Jun;57(6):976-990. doi: 10.1037/dev0001179.
3
Evaluating a Board Game Designed to Promote Young Children's Delay of Gratification.评估一款旨在促进幼儿延迟满足感的棋盘游戏。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 11;11:581025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581025. eCollection 2020.
4
Learning to Wait and Be Altruistic: Testing A Conversational Training in Economic Education for Primary School Children.学会等待与利他:小学经济教育中的对话训练测试
Eur J Psychol. 2021 Nov 30;17(4):306-318. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2453. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Infant expectations of instant or delayed gratification.婴儿对即时或延迟满足的期望。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 5;10(1):19081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76136-9.
6
Individual differences in decision making: Drive and Reward Responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games.决策中的个体差异:驱动力和奖励反应影响经济博弈中的战略谈判。
Behav Brain Funct. 2006 Oct 18;2:35. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-2-35.
7
The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.延迟和社会距离对独裁者和最后通牒游戏的影响。
Behav Processes. 2021 Dec;193:104513. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104513. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
Influence of biases in numerical magnitude allocation on human prosocial decision making.数值大小分配偏差对人类亲社会决策的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Dec 1;118(6):3007-3013. doi: 10.1152/jn.00372.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
9
Waiting for the better reward: Comparison of delay of gratification in young children across two cultures.等待更好的回报:两种文化背景下幼儿延迟满足的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 3;16(9):e0256966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256966. eCollection 2021.
10
Reward-related episodic future thinking and delayed gratification in children.儿童中与奖励相关的情景式未来思维和延迟满足
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Apr;228:105618. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105618. Epub 2022 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning to Wait and Be Altruistic: Testing A Conversational Training in Economic Education for Primary School Children.学会等待与利他:小学经济教育中的对话训练测试
Eur J Psychol. 2021 Nov 30;17(4):306-318. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2453. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Shall I Trust You? From Child-Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships.我该信任你吗?从儿童与机器人的互动到信任关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469. eCollection 2020.
3
Toward a Socio-Material Approach to Cognitive Empathy in Autistic Spectrum Disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
The Development of Theory of Mind and Positive and Negative Reciprocity in Preschool Children.学龄前儿童心理理论及正负互惠性的发展
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 29;7:888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00888. eCollection 2016.
2
The curious relation between theory of mind and sharing in preschool age children.学前儿童心理理论与分享行为之间的奇特关系。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117947. eCollection 2015.
3
Is it patience or motivation? On motivational confounds in intertemporal choice tasks.
迈向一种针对自闭症谱系障碍中认知共情的社会物质方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02965. eCollection 2019.
是耐心还是动机?关于跨期选择任务中的动机混淆
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):196-217. doi: 10.1002/jeab.118. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
4
The role of cognitive and emotional perspective taking in economic decision making in the ultimatum game.认知和情感观点采择在最后通牒博弈中经济决策中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108462. eCollection 2014.
5
Fairness norms and theory of mind in an ultimatum game: judgments, offers, and decisions in school-aged children.最后通牒博弈中的公平规范与心理理论:学龄儿童的判断、提议与决策
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e105024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105024. eCollection 2014.
6
Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? Intertemporal choice, attachment and theory of mind in school-aged children.手中的鸟是否胜过未来的两只?学龄儿童的跨期选择、依恋和心理理论。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 23;5:483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00483. eCollection 2014.
7
The role of moral emotions in the development of children's sharing behavior.道德情感在儿童分享行为发展中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1148-59. doi: 10.1037/a0035191. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies.跨不同社会的亲社会行为的个体发生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 3;110(36):14586-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221217110. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Young children are intrinsically motivated to see others helped.幼儿天生就有帮助他人的内在动力。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):967-72. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440571. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Origins of human cooperation and morality.人类合作与道德的起源。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:231-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812. Epub 2012 Jul 12.