Huang Mengna, Quddus Abdullah, Stinson Lynda, Shikany James M, Howard Barbara V, Kutob Randa M, Lu Bing, Manson JoAnn E, Eaton Charles B
Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Center of Primary Care and Prevention and.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Aug;106(2):614-622. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.145391. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) have been associated with an increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM), whereas the association with artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the associations of ASB and SSB consumption with the risk of developing DM and the potential benefit of replacing SSBs with ASBs or water. The national Women's Health Initiative recruited a large prospective cohort of postmenopausal women between 1993 and 1998. ASB, SSB, and water consumption was measured by lifestyle questionnaires, and DM was self-reported. Of 64,850 women, 4675 developed diabetes over an average of 8.4 y of follow-up. ASBs and SSBs were both associated with an increased risk of DM with an HR of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.36) comparing ASB consumption of ≥2 serving/d to never or <3 serving/mo, and an HR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.17, 1.75) comparing SSB consumption of ≥2 serving/d to <1 serving/wk (1 serving = one 12-ounce can or 355 mL). Subgroup analysis found an increased risk of DM associated with ASBs only in the obese group. Modeling the substitution of SSBs with an equal amount of ASBs did not significantly reduce the risk of developing DM. However, statistically substituting 1 serving of ASBs with water was associated with a significant risk reduction of 5% (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91, 0.99), whereas substituting 1 serving of SSBs with water was associated with a risk reduction of 10% (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.95). ASBs were associated with a 21% increased risk of developing DM, approximately half the magnitude of SSBs (associated with a 43% increased risk). Replacing ASBs and SSBs with water could potentially reduce the risk. However, caution should be taken in interpreting these results as causal because both residual confounding and reverse causation could explain these results.
含糖饮料(SSB)与糖尿病(DM)风险增加有关,而与人工甜味饮料(ASB)的关联尚不清楚。我们旨在评估饮用ASB和SSB与患DM风险之间的关联,以及用ASB或水替代SSB的潜在益处。1993年至1998年期间,全国妇女健康倡议招募了一大群绝经后女性作为前瞻性队列。通过生活方式问卷测量ASB、SSB和水的摄入量,DM通过自我报告获得。在64850名女性中,平均随访8.4年期间有4675人患糖尿病。将每天饮用≥2份ASB与从不饮用或每月饮用<3份相比,ASB和SSB均与DM风险增加有关,风险比(HR)为1.21(95%置信区间:1.08,1.36);将每天饮用≥2份SSB与每周饮用<1份相比,HR为1.43(95%置信区间:1.17,1.75)(1份 = 一听12盎司或355毫升)。亚组分析发现,仅在肥胖组中,ASB与DM风险增加有关。用等量的ASB替代SSB并不能显著降低患DM的风险。然而,从统计学上看,用1份水替代1份ASB可使风险显著降低5%(HR:0.95;95%置信区间:0.91,0.99),而用1份水替代1份SSB可使风险降低10%(HR:0.90;95%置信区间:0.85,0.95)。ASB与患DM风险增加21%有关,约为SSB(与风险增加43%有关)的一半。用水替代ASB和SSB可能会降低风险。然而,在将这些结果解释为因果关系时应谨慎,因为残余混杂和反向因果关系都可能解释这些结果。