Volkov Boris, MacDonald Goldie, Herrera Dionisio, Jones Donna, Patel Mahomed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
J Multidiscip Eval. 2014;10(23):44-50. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Often evaluations of training programs are limited - with many focusing on the aspects that are easy to measure (e.g., reaction of trainees) without addressing the important outcomes of training, such as how trainees applied their new knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Numerous evaluations fail to measure training's effect on job performance because few effective methods are available to do so. Particularly difficult is the problem of evaluating multisite training programs that vary considerably in structure and implementation from one site to another.
NA.
NA.
NA.
We devised a method of a consensus expert review to evaluate the quality of conference abstracts submitted by participants in Field Epidemiology Training Programs - an approach that can provide useful information on how well trainees apply knowledge and skills gained in training, complementing data obtained from other sources and methods. This method is practical, minimally intrusive, and resource-efficient, and it may prove useful for evaluation practice in diverse fields that require training.
NA.
NA.
培训项目的评估往往存在局限性——许多评估侧重于易于衡量的方面(如学员的反应),而未涉及培训的重要成果,比如学员如何应用他们新获得的知识、技能和态度。众多评估未能衡量培训对工作绩效的影响,因为几乎没有有效的方法来进行此项评估。尤其困难的是评估多地点培训项目,这些项目在结构和实施方面因地点不同而差异很大。
无。
无。
无。
我们设计了一种共识专家评审方法,以评估现场流行病学培训项目参与者提交的会议摘要质量——这种方法可以提供有关学员如何很好地应用培训中获得的知识和技能的有用信息,对从其他来源和方法获得的数据起到补充作用。该方法实用、干扰性小且资源高效,可能对需要培训的不同领域的评估实践有用。
无。
无。