Herzallah Mohammad M, Khdour Hussain Y, Taha Ahmad B, Elmashala Amjad M, Mousa Hamza N, Taha Mohamad B, Ghanim Zaid, Sehwail Mahmud M, Misk Adel J, Balsdon Tarryn, Moustafa Ahmed A, Myers Catherine E, Gluck Mark A
Palestinian Neuroscience Initiative, Al-Quds University, Abu Dis, Palestine.
Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 12;8:84. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00084. eCollection 2017.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most common non-motor manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD) affecting 50% of patients. However, little is known about the cognitive correlates of MDD in PD. Using a computer-based cognitive task that dissociates learning from positive and negative feedback, we tested four groups of subjects: (1) patients with PD with comorbid MDD, (2) patients with PD without comorbid MDD, (3) matched patients with MDD alone (without PD), and (4) matched healthy control subjects. Furthermore, we used a mathematical model of decision-making to fit both choice and response time data, allowing us to detect and characterize differences between the groups that are not revealed by cognitive results. The groups did not differ in learning accuracy from negative feedback, but the MDD groups (PD patients with MDD and patients with MDD alone) exhibited a selective impairment in learning accuracy from positive feedback when compared to the non-MDD groups (PD patients without MDD and healthy subjects). However, response time in positive feedback trials in the PD groups (both with and without MDD) was significantly slower than the non-PD groups (MDD and healthy groups). While faster response time usually correlates with poor learning accuracy, it was paradoxical in PD groups, with PD patients with MDD having impaired learning accuracy and PD patients without MDD having intact learning accuracy. Mathematical modeling showed that both MDD groups (PD with MDD and MDD alone) were significantly slower than non-MDD groups in the rate of accumulation of information for stimuli trained by positive feedback, which can lead to lower response accuracy. Conversely, modeling revealed that both PD groups (PD with MDD and PD alone) required more evidence than other groups to make responses, thus leading to slower response times. These results suggest that PD patients with MDD exhibit cognitive profiles with mixed traits characteristic of both MDD and PD, furthering our understanding of both PD and MDD and their often-complex comorbidity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine feedback-based learning in PD with MDD while controlling for the effects of PD and MDD.
重度抑郁症(MDD)是帕金森病(PD)最常见的非运动表现,影响着50%的患者。然而,关于PD中MDD的认知相关性却知之甚少。我们使用一项基于计算机的认知任务,该任务将学习与正性和负性反馈区分开来,测试了四组受试者:(1)患有共病MDD的PD患者,(2)未患有共病MDD的PD患者,(3)匹配的单纯MDD患者(无PD),以及(4)匹配的健康对照受试者。此外,我们使用了一个决策数学模型来拟合选择和反应时间数据,使我们能够检测和描述各群体之间未被认知结果揭示的差异。各群体从负性反馈中的学习准确性没有差异,但与非MDD群体(无MDD的PD患者和健康受试者)相比,MDD群体(患有MDD的PD患者和单纯MDD患者)在从正性反馈中的学习准确性方面表现出选择性损害。然而,PD群体(有和无MDD)在正性反馈试验中的反应时间明显慢于非PD群体(MDD和健康群体)。虽然更快的反应时间通常与较差的学习准确性相关,但在PD群体中却自相矛盾,患有MDD的PD患者学习准确性受损,而无MDD的PD患者学习准确性完好。数学建模表明,两个MDD群体(患有MDD的PD患者和单纯MDD患者)在由正性反馈训练的刺激的信息积累速率上明显慢于非MDD群体,这可能导致较低的反应准确性。相反,建模显示两个PD群体(患有MDD的PD患者和单纯PD患者)做出反应所需的证据比其他群体更多,从而导致反应时间更慢。这些结果表明,患有MDD的PD患者表现出具有MDD和PD混合特征的认知概况,加深了我们对PD和MDD及其通常复杂的共病情况的理解。据我们所知,这是第一项在控制PD和MDD影响的同时,研究患有MDD的PD患者基于反馈的学习的研究。