Suppr超能文献

基于共识的实用最低标准和结构化访谈,以指导癌症支持小组组长的选拔与培养:一份方案文件

Pragmatic, consensus-based minimum standards and structured interview to guide the selection and development of cancer support group leaders: a protocol paper.

作者信息

Pomery Amanda, Schofield Penelope, Xhilaga Miranda, Gough Karla

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e014408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014408.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Across the globe, peer support groups have emerged as a community-led approach to accessing support and connecting with others with cancer experiences. Little is known about qualities required to lead a peer support group or how to determine suitability for the role. Organisations providing assistance to cancer support groups and their leaders are currently operating independently, without a standard national framework or published guidelines. This protocol describes the methods that will be used to generate pragmatic consensus-based minimum standards and an accessible structured interview with user manual to guide the selection and development of cancer support group leaders.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will: (A) identify and collate peer-reviewed literature that describes qualities of support group leaders through a systematic review; (B) content analyse eligible documents for information relevant to requisite knowledge, skills and attributes of group leaders generally and specifically to cancer support groups; (C) use an online reactive Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of experts to produce a clear, suitable, relevant and appropriate structured interview comprising a set of agreed questions with behaviourally anchored rating scales; (D) produce a user manual to facilitate standard delivery of the structured interview; (E) pilot the structured interview to improve clinical utility; and (F) field test the structured interview to develop a rational scoring model and provide a summary of existing group leader qualities.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the Department Human Ethics Advisory Group of The University of Melbourne. The study is based on voluntary participation and informed written consent, with participants able to withdraw at any time. The results will be disseminated at research conferences and peer review journals. Presentations and free access to the developed structured interview and user manual will be available to cancer agencies.

摘要

引言

在全球范围内,同伴支持小组已成为一种由社区主导的方式,用于获得支持并与其他有癌症经历的人建立联系。对于领导同伴支持小组所需的素质或如何确定该角色的合适人选,人们知之甚少。目前,为癌症支持小组及其领导者提供援助的组织各自独立运作,没有标准的国家框架或已发布的指南。本方案描述了将用于生成基于务实共识的最低标准以及一份配有用户手册的可访问结构化访谈的方法,以指导癌症支持小组领导者的选拔和培养。

方法与分析

我们将:(A)通过系统综述识别并整理描述支持小组领导者素质的同行评审文献;(B)对符合条件的文件进行内容分析,以获取与小组领导者一般所需的知识、技能和特质相关的信息,特别是与癌症支持小组相关的信息;(C)与跨学科专家小组使用在线反应式德尔菲法,以生成一份清晰、合适、相关且恰当的结构化访谈,包括一组带有行为锚定评分量表的商定问题;(D)编写一份用户手册,以促进结构化访谈的标准实施;(E)对结构化访谈进行试点,以提高其临床实用性;(F)对结构化访谈进行实地测试,以开发合理的评分模型并总结现有小组领导者的素质。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得墨尔本大学人类伦理咨询小组的批准。该研究基于自愿参与和知情书面同意,参与者可随时退出。研究结果将在研究会议和同行评审期刊上发表。癌症机构可获取相关报告,并免费使用所开发的结构化访谈和用户手册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/5734349/bdd9a4d8e79c/bmjopen-2016-014408f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验