Suppr超能文献

将既定准则应用于医学院的团队学习计划:系统评价。

Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review.

机构信息

Dr. Burgess is executive officer, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Ms. McGregor is research project officer, Workforce Education and Development Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Professor Mellis is professor of medicine and associate dean, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):678-88. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Team-based learning (TBL), a structured form of small-group learning, has gained popularity in medical education in recent years. A growing number of medical schools have adopted TBL in a variety of combinations and permutations across a diversity of settings, learners, and content areas. The authors conducted this systematic review to establish the extent, design, and practice of TBL programs within medical schools to inform curriculum planners and education designers.

METHOD

The authors searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and ERIC databases for articles on TBL in undergraduate medical education published between 2002 and 2012. They selected and reviewed articles that included original research on TBL programs and assessed the articles according to the seven core TBL design elements (team formation, readiness assurance, immediate feedback, sequencing of in-class problem solving, the four S's [significant problem, same problem, specific choice, and simultaneous reporting], incentive structure, and peer review) described in established guidelines.

RESULTS

The authors identified 20 articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria. They found significant variability across the articles in terms of the application of the seven core design elements and the depth with which they were described. The majority of the articles, however, reported that TBL provided a positive learning experience for students.

CONCLUSIONS

In the future, faculty should adhere to a standardized TBL framework to better understand the impact and relative merits of each feature of their program.

摘要

目的

团队学习(TBL)是一种结构化的小组学习形式,近年来在医学教育中越来越受欢迎。越来越多的医学院校在各种环境、学习者和内容领域中以各种组合和排列方式采用 TBL。作者进行了这项系统评价,以确定医学院校 TBL 计划的范围、设计和实践,为课程规划者和教育设计者提供信息。

方法

作者在 MEDLINE、PubMed、Web of Knowledge 和 ERIC 数据库中搜索了 2002 年至 2012 年期间发表的关于本科医学教育中 TBL 的文章。他们选择并审查了包含 TBL 计划原始研究的文章,并根据既定指南中描述的七个核心 TBL 设计要素(团队组建、准备保证、即时反馈、课堂问题解决的顺序、四个 S[重要问题、相同问题、具体选择和同时报告]、激励结构和同伴审查)对文章进行评估。

结果

作者确定了 20 篇符合纳入标准的文章。他们发现,在应用这七个核心设计要素的程度和描述深度方面,这些文章存在显著差异。然而,大多数文章报告称 TBL 为学生提供了积极的学习体验。

结论

未来,教师应遵循标准化的 TBL 框架,以更好地理解其课程中每个特征的影响和相对优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/093e/4885587/80158c23c8a8/acm-89-678-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验