Suppr超能文献

改编后的捐血后激励性访谈可提高献血者保留率。

An adapted postdonation motivational interview enhances blood donor retention.

机构信息

Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2010 Aug;50(8):1778-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02618.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood donors may hold conflicting thoughts about future donation. While they may perceive the direct benefit to themselves and others, they often report compelling reasons not to give again. As a result the standard encouragements to return may not be sufficient to motivate some donors. This study examined the effects of a postdonation adapted motivational interview (AMI) on blood donor attitudes and repeat donation behavior.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Donors (n = 215) were randomly assigned to either an AMI or a no-interview control group. Approximately 1 month after their index donation, donors in the AMI group completed a brief telephone interview to clarify individual-specific motivations and values concerning blood donation and address potential barriers. They were then asked to complete questionnaires regarding donation attitudes, anxiety, self-efficacy, and intention to donate. Donors in the control group were also contacted 1 month after donation and asked to complete the same series of questionnaires.

RESULTS

Donors in the AMI group reported greater intention to provide a future donation (F = 8.13, p < 0.05), more positive donation attitudes (F = 4.59, p < 0.05), and greater confidence in their ability to avoid adverse reactions (F = 10.26, p < 0.01). Further, AMI was associated with higher rates of attempted donation at 12 months (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.87).

CONCLUSION

Application of an AMI may be an effective strategy to increase the donor pool by enhancing retention of existing donors.

摘要

背景

献血者可能对未来的献血持有矛盾的想法。虽然他们可能认为这对自己和他人有直接的好处,但他们往往会报告一些令人信服的理由,说明为什么不再献血。因此,标准的鼓励再次献血的方法可能不足以激励一些献血者。本研究旨在探讨献血后适应性动机访谈(AMI)对献血者态度和重复献血行为的影响。

研究设计与方法

将(n = 215)名献血者随机分配到 AMI 组或无访谈对照组。在他们的献血后约 1 个月,AMI 组的献血者完成了简短的电话访谈,以澄清个人特定的献血动机和价值观,并解决潜在的障碍。然后,他们被要求完成有关献血态度、焦虑、自我效能和献血意愿的问卷。对照组的献血者也在献血后 1 个月被联系,并要求完成相同的一系列问卷。

结果

AMI 组的献血者报告了更高的未来献血意愿(F = 8.13,p < 0.05)、更积极的献血态度(F = 4.59,p < 0.05)和更大的避免不良反应的信心(F = 10.26,p < 0.01)。此外,AMI 与 12 个月时尝试献血的比例较高相关(优势比,2.48;95%置信区间,1.27-4.87)。

结论

应用 AMI 可能是一种通过增强现有献血者的保留率来增加献血者群体的有效策略。

相似文献

7
Knowledge, attitude and beliefs of people in North India regarding blood donation.印度北部民众对献血的知识、态度和信念。
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s21-7. doi: 10.2450/2012.0058-12. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验