• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗专业人员与重病患者沟通的研究议程。

A Research Agenda for Communication Between Health Care Professionals and Patients Living With Serious Illness.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1361-1366. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2005.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2005
PMID:28672373
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Poor communication by health care professionals contributes to physical and psychological suffering in patients living with serious illness. Patients may not fully understand their illness, prognosis, and treatment options or may not receive medical care consistent with their goals. Despite considerable research exploring the role of communication in this setting, many questions remain, and a clear agenda for communication research is lacking.

OBSERVATIONS

Through a consensus conference and subsequent activities, we reviewed the state of the science, identified key evidence gaps in understanding the impact of communication on patient outcomes, and created an agenda for future research. We considered 7 broad topics: shared decision making, advance care planning, communication training, measuring communication, communication about prognosis, emotion and serious illness communication, and cultural issues. We identified 5 areas in which further research could substantially move the field forward and help enhance patient care: measurement and methodology, including how to determine communication quality; mechanisms of communication, such as identifying the specific clinician behaviors that patients experience as both honest and compassionate, or the role of bias in the clinical encounter; alternative approaches to advance care planning that focus on the quality of serious illness communication and not simply completion of forms; teaching and disseminating communication skills; and approaches, such as economic incentives and other clinician motivators, to change communication behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the urgent need to improve quality of communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness through a broad range of research that covers communication skills, tools, patient education, and models of care.

摘要

重要性

医疗保健专业人员沟通不畅会导致重病患者身体和心理上的痛苦。患者可能无法充分了解自己的病情、预后和治疗选择,或者可能无法接受符合其治疗目标的医疗护理。尽管有大量研究探索了这一环境下的沟通作用,但仍存在许多问题,缺乏明确的沟通研究议程。

观察结果

通过共识会议和随后的活动,我们回顾了科学现状,确定了理解沟通对患者结局影响的关键证据差距,并为未来的研究制定了议程。我们考虑了 7 个广泛的主题:共同决策、预先护理计划、沟通培训、沟通测量、预后沟通、情感和严重疾病沟通以及文化问题。我们确定了 5 个可以进一步推动该领域发展并有助于改善患者护理的领域:测量和方法,包括如何确定沟通质量;沟通机制,例如确定患者体验到的诚实和富有同情心的具体临床医生行为,或者临床接触中的偏见作用;预先护理计划的替代方法,重点关注严重疾病沟通的质量,而不仅仅是表格的完成;教学和传播沟通技巧;以及改变沟通行为的方法,如经济激励和其他临床医生激励措施。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了迫切需要通过广泛的研究来改善医疗保健专业人员与重病患者之间的沟通质量,这些研究涵盖沟通技巧、工具、患者教育和护理模式。

相似文献

1
A Research Agenda for Communication Between Health Care Professionals and Patients Living With Serious Illness.医疗专业人员与重病患者沟通的研究议程。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1361-1366. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2005.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
5
Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.关于重病护理目标的沟通:最佳实践的综述和综合。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1994-2003. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271.
6
Improving Communication About Serious Illness in Primary Care: A Review.改善初级保健中严重疾病的沟通:综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1380-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3212.
7
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
10
Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: A Systematic Review.促进重症患者共同决策的工具:一项系统综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1213-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1679.

引用本文的文献

1
Measures to evaluate clinician communication in the intensive care unit: A systematic review of measurement properties.评估重症监护病房临床医生沟通的措施:测量属性的系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Nov;140:109266. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109266. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Developing a training program based on intervention mapping to improve healthcare professionals' communication skills: A study protocol.基于干预映射法制定培训计划以提高医护人员沟通技巧:一项研究方案。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Apr 30;14:162. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1708_23. eCollection 2025.
3
Expanded care planning paradigm for older adults with type 2 diabetes: Rationale, design, and protocol of the PREPARE for Your Diabetes Care randomized trial.
2型糖尿病老年患者的扩展护理计划范式:“为糖尿病护理做好准备”随机试验的原理、设计与方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107913. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107913. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Patient-centered evaluation of integrated care and health equity: evidence from county medical alliances in Henan province.以患者为中心的综合医疗与健康公平性评估:来自河南省县域医共体的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 12;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02468-5.
5
A scoping review of clinical communication in cancer care in Africa.非洲癌症护理中临床沟通的范围综述。
Oncologist. 2025 Apr 4;30(4). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf039.
6
Workplace violence experiences of intensive care unit healthcare providers: a qualitative systematic review and meta--synthesis.重症监护病房医护人员的工作场所暴力经历:一项定性系统评价与元综合分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12446-w.
7
Usability, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Collaborative Agenda-Setting Intervention (CASI) to Promote Person-Centered Ovarian Cancer Care: Development Study.促进以患者为中心的卵巢癌护理的协作议程设定干预措施(CASI)的可用性、可接受性及实施障碍:开发研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 10;11:e66801. doi: 10.2196/66801.
8
Telehealth for the study of palliative care communication: opportunities, methodological challenges, and recommendations.用于姑息治疗沟通研究的远程医疗:机遇、方法学挑战及建议。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 3;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01700-x.
9
"It's hard to talk to a computer, I get it": An exploratory analysis of clinician connection-building communication practices in rural telepalliative care encounters.“与电脑交流很难,我明白这一点”:对农村远程姑息治疗中临床医生建立联系的沟通实践的探索性分析。
PEC Innov. 2025 Jan 25;6:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100377. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Trust in Physicians and End-of-Life Discussions and Preferences for Place of Care Among US Chinese Older Adults.美国华裔老年人对医生的信任、临终讨论及护理地点偏好
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 May;73(5):1558-1565. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19396. Epub 2025 Feb 10.